* Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
@ 2005-09-16 20:33 99% ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2005-09-16 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Friday 16 September 2005 03:34 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:15:26 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>
> wrote:
> | not really ... sometimes you want to keep a package in unstable
> | forever (like the cvs snapshots i make of e17), or until you work
> | some quirks/features out for a new revbump which you would want stable
>
> Those should be in package.mask. ~arch is for candidates for arch that
> haven't yet proven themselves.
ok, e17 packages dont count here. however, your hardcore view i still dont
buy. how about the baselayout-1.9.x -> baselayout-1.11.x stabilization
process ? are you telling me that arch teams should have had the power to
move those into stable without talking to the maintainer ? baselayout may be
a core package, but if you continue with your hard rule here, then it doesnt
matter.
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-15 20:51 [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Aron Griffis
2005-09-16 19:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-16 19:34 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-16 20:33 99% ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox