* Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ?
@ 2003-08-24 16:44 99% ` Spider
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Spider @ 2003-08-24 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]
begin quote
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:32:22 -0500
Alec Berryman <alec@lorax.wox.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 03:59, Spider wrote:
> > Shouldn't system be as close to a POSIX compliant Unix as possible?
> > Or perhaps LSB? If others want minimalism, let them create their
> > own profiles?(Its not difficult. really).
>
> Some interesting programs I found under the "Commands & Utilities"
> section of the LSB
> (http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.3.0/gLSB/gLSB.html#TOCC
> OMMAND):
>
> crontab
> egrep & fgrep
> lpr
> make
> man
> rsync
> tar
>
> Note that the LSB does not include bzip.
No, but portage does in any case ;)
But, Am I the only one who sees an advantage in moving the default
profiles to LSB compliance, and providing an alternated "light" one for
the cases that want them? (heck, if you dislike dhcpcd I'm pretty sure
you don't want the bloat of glibc either, go for uclibc. ;) but sarcasm
aside, the suggestion is serious.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-23 19:04 [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? Marius Mauch
2003-08-23 19:20 ` Wolfram Schlich
2003-08-23 23:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 3:21 ` A. Craig West
2003-08-24 8:59 ` Spider
2003-08-24 16:32 ` Alec Berryman
2003-08-24 16:44 99% ` Spider
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox