* Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
@ 2009-03-02 21:23 99% ` Thilo Bangert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Thilo Bangert @ 2009-03-02 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Thanks Petteri,
>
> 1) Status quo
> - does not allow changing inherit
> - bash version in global scope
> - global scope in general is quite locked down
lets move on!
>
> 2) EAPI in file extension
> - Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild
> a) .ebuild-<eapi>
> - ignored by current Portage
> b) .<eapi>.ebuild
> - current Portage does not work with this
> c) .<eapi>.<new extension>
> - ignored by current Portage
2 a) and 2 c) are fine by me.
>
> 3) EAPI in locked down place in the ebuild
> - Allows changing global scope
> - EAPI can't be changed in an existing ebuild so the PM can trust
> the value in the cache
> - Does not allow changing versioning rules unless version becomes a
> normal metadata variable
> * Needs more accesses to cache as now you don't have to load older
> versions if the latest is not masked
> a) <new extension>
> b) new subdirectory like ebuilds/
> - we could drop extension all together so don't have to argue about
> it any more
> - more directory reads to get the list of ebuilds in a repository
> c) .ebuild in current directory
> - needs one year wait
no thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
regards
Thilo
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-24 22:21 [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives Petteri Räty
2009-03-02 21:23 99% ` Thilo Bangert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox