* Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
@ 2010-04-04 16:55 99% ` Andreas K. Huettel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Andreas K. Huettel @ 2010-04-04 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 639 bytes --]
Am Samstag 03 April 2010 12:27:38 schrieb Krzysztof Pawlik:
> >> Sounds good, can we at the same time get RESOLVED OBSOLETE (for bugs
> >> that are not valid anymore due to changed situation, RESOLVED INVALID
> >> isn't applicable in this case as it implies the bug is and was invalid
> >> from the begining).
+1 for OBSOLETE, that would give a clear response to outdated stable requests
etc...
--
Dr. Andreas K. Huettel
Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics
University of Regensburg
D-93040 Regensburg
Germany
tel. +49 151 241 67748 (mobile)
e-mail mail@akhuettel.de
http://www.akhuettel.de/research/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-03 9:50 [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 10:09 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-04-03 10:27 ` Krzysztof Pawlik
2010-04-04 16:55 99% ` Andreas K. Huettel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox