* Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?
@ 2004-09-19 20:07 99% ` Joshua J. Berry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Joshua J. Berry @ 2004-09-19 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dan Armak; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 491 bytes --]
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:06:29PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
>
> /usr/qt,kde was my decision at the time. I didn't see any obvious better
> FHS-mandated place to put them in. If there's a better place, I'd at least
> like to hear about it.
Why /usr instead of /opt?
Based on my recollection of the FHS, it seems like /opt would be the better
place to put it ...
--
Joshua J. Berry
"I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere."
-- /usr/games/fortune
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2004-09-19 19:50 [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? Thomas Weidner
2004-09-19 20:06 ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19 20:07 99% ` Joshua J. Berry
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox