* Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
@ 2011-12-16 18:40 99% ` Tim Harder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Tim Harder @ 2011-12-16 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 704 bytes --]
On 2011-12-16 Fri 06:05, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > That said, there is probably room for debate over the length of time
> > we leave the bug open. Maybe a week isn't quite long enough - maybe
> > two weeks is better.
When you do timeout a bug and assign it to arches, it would be great if
you could assign it to *all* previously stable arches, not just x86 and
amd64.
I've reopened a few timed out bugs to add missing arches so arch teams
can either drop keywords or stabilize. That way the tree as a whole can
slowly improve rather then just letting x86/amd64 rocket ahead while
having to keep all the old and often deprecated packages around anyway
for all the other stable arches.
Thanks,
Tim
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-11-21 8:41 [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 13:27 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 13:53 ` Rich Freeman
2011-12-16 14:05 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-12-16 18:40 99% ` Tim Harder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox