* Re: [gentoo-dev] About prepalldocs
@ 2009-02-18 20:02 99% ` Mike Auty
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Auty @ 2009-02-18 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> So until we have a decision on what the replacement will be I
> don't see a need to remove current prepalldocs usage but any new usage
> must be avoided.
If it's simply discouraged, perhaps a repoman check, and some people to
come forward with a better suggestion is all that's necessary? Once the
new system's in place the repoman check can be made fatal, and suggest
the new mechanism. That would save endless "do/don't" conversations on
- -dev.
It might also be worthwhile the council posting another official mail
clarifying the position, so that we can all get on with our lives.
Those that don't agree with the council can take the normal steps to
bring their disagreement to their attention...
Mike 5:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmcaWIACgkQu7rWomwgFXomBACeLkFewJjIieT0oA5uMcSWbJyO
dO4AoKhF0PGFz//jWIH1FxhidJ6c9CEx
=AKtW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-18 19:59 [gentoo-dev] About prepalldocs Petteri Räty
2009-02-18 20:02 99% ` Mike Auty
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox