From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23135-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HhQLa-00024F-Cj
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:18:52 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3RDI6ZY031944;
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:18:06 GMT
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3RDGDRX029718
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:16:14 GMT
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b8so577215ana
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=NckQ0sBp3f2N/OIzL/XFv39QgJRoWUWPUhUjz6encHUG/+grbgUtCda5oyvVcoiBfkfGNtLvt9FEN3Piqro6yB9+R1ZF7aDjbKjxaepKRhmloObz0Gyvtp0h5C9pW5uSCotcrpx6OOpU4QTR0OVebplbA5vQIoblhYdkRbKdgCw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=dYnoCYCLrCM9QYCh6182HqL0HPs/JRZFnD5u3jJxl5Pfj+rBe9MLaXpTLNzoCqTwTSVGWZ1ypHBn7Wkq2nG9JuUpE9cZWG53Vrd0hM8NNn469vgdpSPtiAqzS51KH2c7fF+Jl6eLly9sF8wE+Qv+jQeSXPHfC4MYk0OkBydKXvM=
Received: by 10.100.93.5 with SMTP id q5mr116170anb.1177679771328;
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.107.17 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9fce88250704270616m21c4c3dka28530e4a726235b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:16:11 +0200
From: "Jakub Moc" <jakub.moc@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs
In-Reply-To: <fcaeb9bf0704270604p6d6fcdc9ga685209f51e14e1b@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070426194006.GP7846@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net>
<fcaeb9bf0704261424m618c80b2ua2a91d892175c82e@mail.gmail.com>
<46311AE3.70600@gentoo.org>
<fcaeb9bf0704270604p6d6fcdc9ga685209f51e14e1b@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 307bfcf4-2401-4859-a423-8e15d86eeecd
X-Archives-Hash: fc43ef2186e31e230405eaf777f437f1
On 4/27/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <tsunam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > > It should take devaway into account.
> > >
> > why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into
> > account is pointless in my opinion as it won't improve it being properly
> > assigned...as it'll be covered in other cases, and its not like there's
> > not bugs for all of us dev's that have not sat there for a month or so,
> > at some point
>
> I meant if a maintainer is away, his/her herd should be assignee with
> him/her CCed.
Eh; if the maintainer has been away for months (a.k.a MIA), then
yeah... otherwise, no reason for this if someone's away for a week.
Sorry to disappoint you and others here, but the scripts will lack
artificial intelligence and frankly I don't see what exactly are you
expecting from this whole thing. Anyway, good luck. ;)
--
Jakub Moc
Email: jakub.moc@gmail.com
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list