From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-22815-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1Hdv7u-0008Lx-8d
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:22:14 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3HLLFwP024455;
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:21:15 GMT
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.188])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3HLJEVt022160
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:19:14 GMT
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so2760890mue
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=fr5oENlKF3wvzACWBrraY1GLKZFtcNcXAb7dZLH5CrEx9shpnB9hpWDhYbK84hjN+ev64Wgr3I0GQzQ53NOK3Mivyl/dQGcNdoWv2a7tx67wz6F1l6awGLyDN8/+XDeppYjTcSResp1d73i6AyixyKM1lMWcUF5JGzPbKVBiAMQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=snAysEfoLiZFnk8pd/OE13aKt9YGljUvwJWPK+Qu9cH1ciVfT+oE/8sOBJn4GQrDgT6oQ3NLcM4vgJbNJg+CRWoxXTnGjNkOpu2aKFuOTHMcb0G5puwljffCA7532dqd0JDFT2FHH+qnDR/KuhIdMmIC2NoJwTZrlgGGV/8sjqI=
Received: by 10.82.167.5 with SMTP id p5mr11134736bue.1176844754103;
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.82.162.15 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9fce88250704171419l2c0511a4gdf7df236c11e274c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:19:14 +0200
From: "Jakub Moc" <jakub.moc@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] FYI: Jakub suspended two weeks for bad behaviour
In-Reply-To: <20070417190918.GK10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070416230204.GW10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
<4624E926.8060700@gentoo.org> <462511DA.1040902@gentoo.org>
<20070417184941.GJ10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
<462519C8.3030603@gentoo.org>
<20070417190918.GK10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: dbf44227-f7ca-49be-975c-6064c67db412
X-Archives-Hash: c3050fbb695f49874cba459c2b818691
On 4/17/07, Bryan =D8stergaard <kloeri@gentoo.org> wrote:
> It's not about how old the bugs are. Some action might very well be in
> order on old bugs but you still have to work with the maintainer. If you
> make a reasonable attempt at contacting the maintainer and don't get any
> responses for say 2 weeks reassigning the bug might be in order.
So - why are you lying here again? I've already stated that you
'(devrel) have been CCed on the last email conversation w/ peitolm,
you've been well aware when the last re-assign happened about one year
ago as well. Yeah, you didn't give a damn, what reasonable steps to
contact a developer that doesn't care for anything but re-assigning
bugs back to himself to keep ignoring them for yet another year do you
expect?
Sorry, you've miserably failed, you should have retired this guy long
time ago before things went this far, since he obviously doesn't care
about Gentoo users, but just about his territorial pissings. Instead,
you've chosen to jump on me for doing my job. Oh well done indeed.
> Just reassigning the bug and disregarding the maintainers wish is rude
> at best and doesn't exactly make future cooperation any easier imo.
Maybe just read above? What kind of co-operation are you expecting wrt
developers who have repeatedly shown that they can't plain be bothered
with fixing their junk, because they are just way too cool to deal
with some useless idiots, such as bug wranglers?
--
Jakub Moc
Email: jakub.moc@gentoo.org
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list