public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allen Parker <infowolfe@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Considering dropping the hardened toolchain (A Quantitive Approach)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:16:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f279016040918221659d98b1f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040919020622.GA6080@darklands>

Hey Ned, solar, hardened folks...

I've got a couple of pennies to throw into this mix:
Even though my own participation (due to work schedules - 3 jobs
doesn't leave a whole lot of time for other stuff) has waned, I
believe that your hardened toolchain is top-notch. Yes, it's bleeding
edge, it's not mature, etc... that doesn't mean we should have a
partial-birth abortion. Hardened has been around for a while, yes, but
if you spend 10 minutes in #gentoo you'll see, a LOT of our users
aren't prepared for something as in-depth as hardened.

Gentoo currently LEADS linux distributions in configurability in
regards to hardened/selinux/security. Bar NONE! For the experienced,
hardened *can't* be replaced by anything out there. If I had the skill
level to assist in any way, I'd be the first guy in line to help.
Unfortunately, my experience is more limited to finding
non-programming solutions to get the job, whatever that job may be,
done. Perhaps this thread will catch someone's eye, someone that CAN
help, at least drum up some user support.

Solar, before reading your email, I had no idea that you were feeling
like that. Maybe we can get someone with a *little* more experience
than me, perhaps a trusted user/non-dev that can be a bug-filter?

To the hardened community: If you can afford the time, check
bugs.gentoo.org for hardened bugs... if there are bugs that you know
of that are FUD, email a list of bug #'s to your favorite hardened
dev, after replying with a solution to the particular user, whether or
not it's a PEBKAC issue or not.

that's all for me, gotta head back to work *sigh*

Allen Parker
infowolfe@irc.freenode.net (when i'm online) #/tmp #gentoo-hardened #gentoo-dev.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-19  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-18  6:10 [gentoo-dev] Considering dropping the hardened toolchain Ned Ludd
2004-09-18 15:54 ` [gentoo-dev] Considering dropping the hardened toolchain (A Quantitive Approach) Alexander Gabert
2004-09-18 17:01   ` Thierry Carrez
2004-09-18 17:27     ` Rumen Yotov
2004-09-18 18:27   ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-19  2:06     ` Thomas Zimmerman
2004-09-19  5:16       ` Allen Parker [this message]
2004-09-19  5:41         ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-19 22:16     ` Lars Weiler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f279016040918221659d98b1f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=infowolfe@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox