From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HakHK-0007NN-T5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:10:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3939WeM020139; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:09:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3937ENP017885 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:07:15 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72C965001 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:07:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.159 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.159 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.236, TW_NV=0.077] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id no4sHN57Rtzy for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC1065046 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l58so771586wrl for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:07:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=BRBhbehs/8UaEVJChabBtmIpxpAKuIBdK2e42UAWhPUWR4FWoOTwKGUQaiaeAvXseRyfJgln4gZW9Ezz3SnUGPst9IoKMLyyXkSoOVcx6AvRSE/XNdkRJzRUstfcGeHLakqWNsm+Re68XRp7NrFs3KOkSbr+eSvWmPEdiP0Soq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=rUJIT+fNZ9AGkljFbDdJL9moomAHXPey/LiqycmNthW+VwjoIDYobqv2C+i0t51MNslirWCKKVcka5mC8km0j868q17tVXu8mX9dcQbg8p+m5ThwCCCdUL6SdwtehViJxBilNrc8cxe6E9zZ0W3KoSg1nmF/QSG71AeD66w8c1E= Received: by 10.115.46.9 with SMTP id y9mr2139223waj.1176088031752; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.179.3 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e83288a0704082007o40b2f092mbcbe9f0ac09292fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:07:11 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marcelo_G=F3es?=" Sender: marcelogoes@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0724a859d0fd3a2a X-Archives-Salt: 3bbeed6b-4306-4157-84ea-859063cd5d65 X-Archives-Hash: b10e801a460c8664fcdad1aadca7bbc9 Hello, I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d. As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is 1) cleaner and easier to read 2) more portable (for systems that use something other than /etc/env.d, for example) Does it make sense to allow both styles? Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? Cheers, Marcelo --=20 Marcelo G=F3es -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list