From: "Marcelo Góes" <vanquirius@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] New Glep 46 Draft: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:29:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e83288a0603051029nf7504bl3692885566d5e147@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 200 bytes --]
Hello,
I am basically mailing this new draft on behalf of Ciaran, I just ok'd it :-).
Please read and comment.
Cheers,
Marcelo
--
Marcelo Góes
marcelogoes@gmail.com
vanquirius@gentoo.org
[-- Attachment #2: glep-0046.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4093 bytes --]
GLEP: 46
Title: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml
Version: $Revision: 1.1 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2005/12/27 00:26:58 $
Author: Marcelo Goes <vanquirius@gentoo.org>, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 26-Dec-2005
Abstract
========
Tree ``metadata.xml`` files are currently used to specify maintainer and
description information for packages. This GLEP proposes extensions to
``metadata.xml`` to allow storage of information about upstream.
Motivation
==========
The range of upstream-related data currently available to developers and
tool authors is currently limited to ``DESCRIPTION`` and ``HOMEPAGE`` in
ebuilds.
There have been several attempts at creating tools that check a
package's versions against Freshmeat to see whether an ebuild version
bump is required. Currently identifying a package's Freshmeat entry is a
matter of guesswork, and not something that can reliably be automated.
Similarly, various scripts exist to check a package's status against a
specialist external data source. One of the authors, for example, has a
shell script hack that tries to determine whether any ``app-vim``
packages need bumping by checking the associated ``vim.org`` script
page. Again, tying packages to external data source entries is not
particulaly straight forward.
Making additional upstream-related data easily available will have other
benefits:
* It will allow systems such as the Packages website to provide more
useful information to end users.
* It will reduce the time spent by developers trying to find how to
contact upstream.
Specification
=============
``metadata.dtd`` should allow the use of a upstream tag in
``metadata.xml``. Inside the upstream tag, developers should be able to
add upstream related information.
This GLEP defines the following four tags for ``upstream``:
``maintainer``, ``changelog``, ``bugs-to`` and ``remote-id``, none of
which are mandatory. Future GLEPs may extend this -- tools processing
metadata.xml should ignore unrecognized elements.
``maintainer`` can contain the tags ``name`` and ``email``, indicating
the person or organization responsible for upstream maintainership of
the package.
``name`` should contain a block of text with upstream's name.
``email`` should contain an e-mail address in the format foo@bar.bar.
``changelog`` should contain a URL prefixed with ``http://`` or
``https://`` where the location of the upstream changelog can be found.
``bugs-to`` should contain a place where bugs can be filed, a URL
prefixed with ``http://`` or ``https://`` or an e-mail address prefixed
with ``mailto:``.
``remote-id`` should specify a type of package identification tracker
and the identification that corresponds to the package in question.
``remote-id`` should make it easier to index information such as its
Freshmeat ID or its CPAN name.
The ``remote-id`` element has a ``type`` attribute, which is a string
identifying the type of upstream source. Examples are ``freshmeat``, in
which case the element content should be the Freshmeat ID or ``vim``, in
which case the element content should be the ``vim.org`` script
identifier. This GLEP does not specify a complete list of legal values
for ``type`` -- developers should email the ``gentoo-dev`` mailing list
before using a new ``type`` value.
For example, a ``metadata.xml`` upstream snippet may look like::
<upstream>
<maintainer>
<name>Foo Bar</name>
<email>foo@bar.bar</email>
</maintainer>
<changelog>http://foo.bar/changelog.txt</changelog>
<bugs-to>https://bugs.foo.bar</bugs-to>
<remote-id type="freshmeat">12345</remote-id>
<remote-id type="sourceforge">foobar</remote-id>
</upstream>
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
No changes are necessary to existing ``metadata.xml`` files. Information
in the new tags is not be mandatory. Any sane tool that currently
handles ``metadata.xml`` files will simply ignore unrecognised elements.
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
.. vim: set ft=glep tw=72 :
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-05 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-05 18:29 Marcelo Góes [this message]
2006-03-06 1:48 ` [gentoo-dev] New Glep 46 Draft: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml Marius Mauch
2006-03-06 0:58 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-03-06 2:04 ` Chris White
2006-03-06 3:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-03-06 3:48 ` Chris White
2006-03-06 20:20 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-03-12 6:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2006-03-12 17:36 ` Marcelo Góes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e83288a0603051029nf7504bl3692885566d5e147@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vanquirius@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox