From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25542-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1IDPDf-0004qf-97
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:34:51 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6OIXeSc013179;
	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:33:40 GMT
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6OIVcvV010780
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:31:38 GMT
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so217220ugf
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=cp8R/s405Kkrv2c+O0XX8kFIWeW6/mWga37jcmvQ56X9ShJqTQujAI4p7cCUt/YnuQAu39EgW5/sApxOFCp5U2IsTdHGoBfI/PYMDtGg3k2g8SrQVrTzOSjCK6DZ3IBnHXBaqKkXXYI/ShNXTJCH+nOmmQ1ykWO9yQ2fEPbsyTA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=aFcG/kpXGvbQwgS0cG6d9PqySbNKjatA8raz0JvfTKtf86DMXxPNqPr6h1E3TQ0VBTYiebiR9LU2frRMfcBS6mQ9ApfbW1GsC+E2OMUk3wYS0jK7HW/Ften5UqoLPnevHbtd3oM+/lCQoAkrsBZsvXnewTs8iTdgS79GpNbT464=
Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr3515395buf.1185301897829;
        Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.82.163.6 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0707241131o8096ba2rca44df0fa8b6b422@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:37 +0300
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl@gentoo.org>
Sender: alon.barlev@gmail.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-2 stablisation plans
In-Reply-To: <1185028563.2490.22.camel@uberpc.marples.name>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1185028563.2490.22.camel@uberpc.marples.name>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: e84847968547e770
X-Archives-Salt: 7dfdb697-dfea-4eff-b784-7c2c90078820
X-Archives-Hash: 61a9beda8abecfb73144cd4b9b6c46a8

On 7/21/07, Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org> wrote:
> This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
> plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
> it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
> though). Arch teams will then be pinged on a bug to keyword
> baselayout-2.

Hi!
Just an issue I thought a long while ago...
What about adding USE flags for all optional networking components...
So that they installed without manually merging them one by one?

Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list