From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IDPDf-0004qf-97 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:34:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6OIXeSc013179; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:33:40 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6OIVcvV010780 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:31:38 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so217220ugf for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:31:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=cp8R/s405Kkrv2c+O0XX8kFIWeW6/mWga37jcmvQ56X9ShJqTQujAI4p7cCUt/YnuQAu39EgW5/sApxOFCp5U2IsTdHGoBfI/PYMDtGg3k2g8SrQVrTzOSjCK6DZ3IBnHXBaqKkXXYI/ShNXTJCH+nOmmQ1ykWO9yQ2fEPbsyTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=aFcG/kpXGvbQwgS0cG6d9PqySbNKjatA8raz0JvfTKtf86DMXxPNqPr6h1E3TQ0VBTYiebiR9LU2frRMfcBS6mQ9ApfbW1GsC+E2OMUk3wYS0jK7HW/Ften5UqoLPnevHbtd3oM+/lCQoAkrsBZsvXnewTs8iTdgS79GpNbT464= Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr3515395buf.1185301897829; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.163.6 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0707241131o8096ba2rca44df0fa8b6b422@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:37 +0300 From: "Alon Bar-Lev" Sender: alon.barlev@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-2 stablisation plans In-Reply-To: <1185028563.2490.22.camel@uberpc.marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1185028563.2490.22.camel@uberpc.marples.name> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e84847968547e770 X-Archives-Salt: 7dfdb697-dfea-4eff-b784-7c2c90078820 X-Archives-Hash: 61a9beda8abecfb73144cd4b9b6c46a8 On 7/21/07, Roy Marples wrote: > This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I > plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and > it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked > though). Arch teams will then be pinged on a bug to keyword > baselayout-2. Hi! Just an issue I thought a long while ago... What about adding USE flags for all optional networking components... So that they installed without manually merging them one by one? Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list