From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D14F15817D for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 987B9E2AEA; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563E1E2ADF for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9d11b03ad7007a9f01e67f8b792d7eff5458d664.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: ltprune.eclass From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 18:16:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <3fb256412dd518ad8224a6c2d36a4bb792ad44c7.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KTMHRYzQWw3s70w6lJQM" User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: bd4aea9b-6b61-45b5-92ba-c5996d3cddf3 X-Archives-Hash: dad0fe42a046828971fbaf56caba9b90 --=-KTMHRYzQWw3s70w6lJQM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2024-06-08 at 18:11 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 08 Jun 2024, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > No ebuilds are using the ltprune.eclass anymore, so I've marked it @DEA= D > > for removal. >=20 > gnome2.eclass still inherits ltprune, shouldn't this be updated first? > That is, drop EAPI 6 support from gnome2.eclass? >=20 FWICS, soap's already working on it. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-KTMHRYzQWw3s70w6lJQM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmZkg9kSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQONVcIALhGbkZ5LEMNh6pPiVqijRHxofycCsAU FjPMYEwqOQZfPByE/5bhxSmQMeVTGTEy/Vkh+KjlAyZrwQE9Vf9vZP4XeTlWp9al +5v75CSVdQ1EEnqFUVRP/R+XP0exQznym8m6+nZAo9lyS8I1ZxVW+4g+TCtNepFH 1KH40PUoLSUN7Wgi4OZaf+LUjQUKEpFVgb7/7aIzIsUmePmaHRly7fDtRVCyXZEA txuFHICFyeNCczUkSbSsih/wMKWQ61K0pgpwsDYj5OrVDyzblFp5ChKvS6gSmlVY uqokmMcui2lhmRwZSzLflKqbFto1U1WFf6u2+L0F9pusH8l60YD6SgY= =H3wb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KTMHRYzQWw3s70w6lJQM--