From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23698-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HndFi-00057C-Gk
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:18:27 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4EGFjMq013063;
Mon, 14 May 2007 16:15:45 GMT
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4EG9hhD002210
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:09:43 GMT
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 60so1659091wri
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=S3nlkNyvhKVtYysuf44/Ty6cEzIhA1vlmiem75k2wMQA8w2peCAcTOsa298EWiyXxsJCenh33dvlkFnH6QVCXgqkqMmWuWbi6EUstUsaz8japJfWOxb1fdHKV1lV5qoytEeAA8pk3JQ2aXUZFgnrmYaiJB8oT6HJYUiO3zCZKqA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=WeX+JoNGOBjKQtaCBXliBIv44rj3wwwDhilXHKuLl4F2V+fjXdaYwh/VlYh3sFUxYGxCuHUr/yaiITdxxwFE+sULzFhkwBpDXWfdCjOFuXEAmCwqNTzHVOW7jVtNMM/TQuvj0bwrjNSEO2cBkqnKpRddpMbB/yYEWTSygZn2Jpc=
Received: by 10.78.120.6 with SMTP id s6mr2400029huc.1179158981813;
Mon, 14 May 2007 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.137.1 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9c040ecd0705140909n6f83e68ds119fe6a50651a57a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:09:41 +0100
From: "Dan Offord" <d.offord@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] trial software in portage?
In-Reply-To: <464878A9.9060305@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_132320_17496385.1179158981739"
References: <200705142126.17643.dragonheart@gentoo.org>
<464863A5.6060407@gentoo.org> <46486D73.5000704@gentoo.org>
<200705141647.10990.carlo@gentoo.org> <464878A9.9060305@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 0305f644-d27d-4396-8af5-09cafb1d0b1d
X-Archives-Hash: 2f5be1eb3f1146f191ed28bbaa35a398
------=_Part_132320_17496385.1179158981739
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
There is a bug report on app-cdr/nero still waiting for the maintainer to
update the portage tree, so that the current version of nero actually
downloads, rather than its current state of constant 404 errors.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172717
On 14/05/07, Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Carsten Lohrke napsal(a):
> > On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> >> Uhm, kindly leave app-arch/rar alone; that unrar-gpl thing is just a
> bad
> >> joke.
> >
> > There's app-arch/unrar, so this is no point. When unrar-gpl is so
> broken, why
> > it's in the tree?
> >
> >
> > Carsten
>
> As the name unrar suggests, it doesn't *pack* stuff, in only unpacks it.
> So, thanks and leave the thing alone in the tree; and yeah, there are
> really people who work w/ .rar stuff still, tar.{gz,bz2} hasn't
> dominated the world yet.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Jakub Moc
> mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
> GPG signature:
> http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
> Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA
> 3D9E
>
> ... still no signature ;)
>
>
>
------=_Part_132320_17496385.1179158981739
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
There is a bug report on app-cdr/nero still waiting for the maintainer to update the portage tree, so that the current version of nero actually downloads, rather than its current state of constant 404 errors.<br><br><a href="http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172717">
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172717</a><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 14/05/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jakub Moc</b> <<a href="mailto:jakub@gentoo.org">jakub@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Carsten Lohrke napsal(a):<br>> On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:<br>>> Uhm, kindly leave app-arch/rar alone; that unrar-gpl thing is just a bad<br>>> joke.<br>><br>> There's app-arch/unrar, so this is no point. When unrar-gpl is so broken, why
<br>> it's in the tree?<br>><br>><br>> Carsten<br><br>As the name unrar suggests, it doesn't *pack* stuff, in only unpacks it.<br>So, thanks and leave the thing alone in the tree; and yeah, there are<br>
really people who work w/ .rar stuff still, tar.{gz,bz2} hasn't<br>dominated the world yet.<br><br><br>--<br>Best regards,<br><br> Jakub Moc<br> mailto:<a href="mailto:jakub@gentoo.org">jakub@gentoo.org</a><br> GPG signature:
<br> <a href="http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E">http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E</a><br> Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
<br><br> ... still no signature ;)<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_132320_17496385.1179158981739--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list