public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jesús Guerrero" <i92guboj@terra.es>
To: <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:57:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99cec4046b6897dbff2e733ee0ab8dab@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AACCDBF.5020207@gentoo.org>

On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:47:27 -0400, Richard Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>> 
>> Most Gentoo users will have no problem to use overlays as they need
>> them. If we had more developers we could as maintain more packages,
>> as simple as that.
>> 
> 
> I actually tend to agree with this position,

It's not something to agree or disagree. There aren't developers to
maintain
all the software under the sun, period.

> however to use overlays as 
> a valid solution for end-users we need to do more to support them. 

Yeah, devs for that as well.

> Right now it is at least a little painful to get set up with an overlay.


No, it's a matter of using layman -a <whatever>

>   There also isn't really any official place to vet overlays, and there 
> isn't any official source for overlays that aren't maintained by gentoo.
> 
> Sure, overlays.g.o has tons of overlays - but which ones are 
> mostly-stable, and which ones are intended to break systems?  What is 
> the QA policy for each overlay?  If I'm an end-user not interested in 
> breaking my system, what overlays are safe for me to use?

There's no policy. Just like unofficial repos for any other distro.
We can't control that. It's outside Gentoo.

While I agree that having more packages and being more up to date is
a good thing, I can never agree that we should sacrifice Gentoo for that.
You want stability for what I see on your answer, well, that's what you
have. I don't think we can do any more with the number of developers we
have right now unless we start dumping blindingly and without any check
every ebuild that we get across.

-- 
Jesús Guerrero



  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-13 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-11 23:02 [gentoo-dev] DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-12  2:24 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-09-12 12:15   ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-14  2:46     ` Ryan Hill
2009-09-29  1:08       ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-09-12  4:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Aaron Bauman
2009-09-12 17:26   ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-12 11:23 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-09-12 17:29   ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13  9:11 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-13 10:47   ` Richard Freeman
2009-09-13 10:57     ` Jesús Guerrero [this message]
2009-09-13 13:24       ` Richard Freeman
2009-09-13 19:39         ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 19:38       ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 11:30     ` [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] Thomas Sachau
2009-09-13 18:57       ` Patrick Lauer
2009-09-13 19:03         ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-13 19:41           ` Patrick Lauer
2009-09-13 20:04             ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-09-13 19:25         ` Alexander Færøy
2009-09-13 19:45           ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 20:00             ` Alexander Færøy
2009-09-13 20:02             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-13 20:17               ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-14 14:05                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-14 18:28                   ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-14 18:51                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-14 22:03                     ` Zac Medico
2009-09-16 20:31                       ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-16 21:21                         ` Zac Medico
2009-09-13 13:59   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future Duncan
2009-09-13 14:36     ` Dale
2009-09-13 15:05       ` Albert Hopkins
2009-09-13 15:45         ` Dale
2009-09-13 19:52           ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-13 21:25             ` Dale
2009-09-13 21:54               ` Alex Legler
2009-09-13 22:08                 ` Dale
2009-09-13 22:53                   ` Alex Legler
2009-09-13 23:06                     ` Dale
2009-09-13 20:00     ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-20 19:12       ` Duncan
2009-09-21  2:10         ` Angelo Arrifano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99cec4046b6897dbff2e733ee0ab8dab@localhost \
    --to=i92guboj@terra.es \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox