From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JgElp-0004oa-Lx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:49:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5328CE0381; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CB1E0381 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so2199183fge.14 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.51.2 with SMTP id y2mr4297687fgy.15.1206949771456; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.70.16 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97a4d67e0803310049j34de0ae1jc7ecff5563141d7e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:49:31 +0200 From: "Anders Ossowicki" Sender: and@vennemindenet.dk To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename) In-Reply-To: <200803310940.45136.bangert@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4224_19057018.1206949771446" References: <20080330023902.GA8787@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20080330034811.39942523@snowcone> <200803310940.45136.bangert@gentoo.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0b2aa70f28ccde64 X-Archives-Salt: 1572a32e-6074-49ef-9920-26b1c3331b78 X-Archives-Hash: f4e2cb2935a5f4bf8e833cf041293f34 ------=_Part_4224_19057018.1206949771446 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 31/03/2008, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > > Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs > > 'fixed' via specification next time... > > maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities are > failing me, but i find the above sentence highly offensive. pkgcore crashes on ebuilds with explicit -r0 in the PV, which led to Brian Harring bringing this entire discussion up in the first place. Rather than getting pkgcore to handle -r0 correctly, he decided to try and get it banned through the specification. Please note, the above does not imply anything about my feelings towards the original proposal, so please don't take it as such. I really couldn't care less what you decide to do or not do. am i too thin skinned for gentoo-dev? > > In this particular case, I'd say yes :-) -- Anders Ossowicki ------=_Part_4224_19057018.1206949771446 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 31/03/2008, Thilo Bangert <bangert@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs
> 'fixed' via specification next time...

maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities are
failing me, but i find the above sentence highly offensive.

pkgcore crashes on ebuilds with explicit -r0 in the PV, which led to Brian Harring bringing this entire discussion up in the first place. Rather than getting pkgcore to handle -r0 correctly, he decided to try and get it banned through the specification.

Please note, the above does not imply anything about my feelings towards the original proposal, so please don't take it as such. I really couldn't care less what you decide to do or not do.

am i too thin skinned for gentoo-dev?

In this particular case, I'd say yes :-)

--
Anders Ossowicki <and@vmn.dk> ------=_Part_4224_19057018.1206949771446-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list