From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54FF3138350 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 22:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39694E0CA2; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 22:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF260E0C87 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 22:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tuxk10.localnet (unknown [176.120.163.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: asturm@gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BB4834DFF0; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 22:32:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Sturmlechner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Joshua Kinard Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:32:39 +0100 Message-ID: <9630692.nUPlyArG6x@tuxk10> In-Reply-To: <15005ba1-1a1b-5d71-dbe3-7834b79ee733@gentoo.org> References: <15005ba1-1a1b-5d71-dbe3-7834b79ee733@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2086385.iZASKD2KPV"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 2ae1e6f1-a51f-4b99-90a6-c280b0d6955c X-Archives-Hash: 7994e3e7ea2c0f482a76484d60ff0d87 --nextPart2086385.iZASKD2KPV Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote: > It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from the tree in > the same manner as an EAPI deprecation and removal, given how ingrained it > is due to its longevity. That will minimize the whiplash-effect of emerge > complaining about slot conflicts and dependency conflicts. Like I just ran > into w/ setuptools-45.0.0.0's release. So, no packaging of >=setuptools-45.0.0 until the end of 2020? Do you want to freeze all python libs that upstreams are dropping py27 support from? --nextPart2086385.iZASKD2KPV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEE0boeld+XzHuYwChrAardCbqe1nUFAl4bnodfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEQx QkExRTk1REY5N0NDN0I5OEMwMjg2QjAxQUFERDA5QkE5RUQ2NzUACgkQAardCbqe 1nVFFAgAk5cFwSl8v4bWdCOSuInOX1L6CYptkim/iU9Avw/Wmp0mm6DzjJZTdip6 UhmwryD3+w2w4bk26Q0ajSssrFXp+a23nCk+0ap+VPSDVbIHn8HScrxKNx+aJIZc Pw/KTuo7Tmo50FLOyj9kl/tZRLxRjKNhhxK8AtUE/079cY2skUDMDyhfJUUUuPOn WOrcDCNSZDlLHsxqNbaNPHXKNdGTYMeYUC1SuUQappk1/rBQ5cFS3qSlMu/Kdd6Y HEyJ+ElQcMbBiiKHCeZW25j/F/lR0HfJ8T1jKcRWe7lHfVKVQ5wmtzxFhQPJo9LW y42kn2IPQkmvZxmNrdIGQx02yP2v1g== =4GkS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2086385.iZASKD2KPV--