From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdbZr-0004M4-9M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:52:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJMpuCB024744; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:51:56 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJMk7o8014999 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:46:07 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AEFA14A00 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:46:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09248-07 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:46:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5E2A149FC for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:46:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:46:01 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <959899955.20051119234601@gentoo.org> To: Brian Harring Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain In-Reply-To: <20051119221941.GB4535@nightcrawler> References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <200511182022.00662.cshields@gentoo.org> <437EAABE.5050502@gentoo.org> <200511182042.30961.cshields@gentoo.org> <437F93A3.9080808@gentoo.org> <437F9739.4060501@gentoo.org> <20051119221941.GB4535@nightcrawler> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------8B7B1B3709C2FD" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[SPF_NEUTRAL=1.379] X-Spam-Score: 1.379 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archives-Salt: d06380a4-2608-49aa-a3c8-7e81d2d49c27 X-Archives-Hash: 763fb4851fe24cfa69bb52ae1623bbb9 ------------8B7B1B3709C2FD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A19.11.2005, 23:19:41, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 03:20:57PM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: >> I would have preferred that the people involved with this could >> have directly asked infra if this would work for us. That's a simple >> request that I did not see from these folks. > It's a crazy notion, but y'all could've commented in the *TWO* months=20 > that this glep has been percolating, "yo, what do you want from an=20 > infra standpoint?". > Or implemented anoncvs in the meantime, thus nuking the main request=20 > that's being made of infra. /ne notes there's been no such thing like subdomains in the *original* (rejected) GLEP... -- jakub ------------8B7B1B3709C2FD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDf6sphxfV/c66PZ4RAvCHAJ9wHgqopEBu2CWI1pRP2pMoqk1fbQCgp69k KpzlEMwvZ1u2lD7UtRDhfOw= =5oR8 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------8B7B1B3709C2FD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list