From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18973 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 00:21:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 00:21:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BoWlf-0004JW-S7 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:21:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 31321 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2004 00:21:31 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 482 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 00:21:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200407241956.47777.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <8DD1D809-DDC9-11D8-B5A6-000D93283962@gentoo.org> <200407241956.47777.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <92DDEBB3-DDD0-11D8-B5A6-000D93283962@gentoo.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Pieter Van den Abeele From: Pieter Van den Abeele Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:21:29 +0200 To: Mike Frysinger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] macos mess X-Archives-Salt: 0d9a5997-95d2-489f-8306-b4dd801ab583 X-Archives-Hash: cad8a488d431b2bc590fc43569a853dc On 25 Jul 2004, at 01:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: > are you suggesting we do this with every new random arch we add that > isnt a > standard linux port ? no > seems like an unintuitive workaround it's so far the most clean and simplest solution to a problem, that can be removed when portage gets support for the featured integrated. I've opened a bug a while ago and described it as 'persistent injected packages'. > why not push something a little more intelligent ... perhaps a new > file for > portage to utilize in cases like this ... the profile has a special > file > where you can define packages that are assumed to be satisified I won't push, I'll code. Best regards, Pieter Van den Abeele > -mike > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list