[gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12

[gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12

[Nick Jones]

I just pushed portage-2.0.46-r12 out. I need some testers on it.
It's mostly fixups on -r10/-r11 and should be free and clear of
problems now. I'd like to unmask this ASAP, so test and lemme know.

/etc/make.profile/use.mask and /etc/portage/use.mask are concatenated
and used by repoman/portage now as general masking for USE flags. One
USE entry per line. The files are concatenated. ARCH cannot be masked.
Other arches can, but not the one specified in your profile.

There's a broken-404-redirector detector now... So html/404 distfile
corruption should slow down/stop. There are also some resume fixes
that should help out with the seemingly increasing number of mirrors
that are not carrying current files.

emerge -vp exists to show enabled/disabled use flags courtasy of a
user-submitted patch.

Distcc is enabled via features now, along with some other CC/CXX
fixes that came about with gcc-config.

Nabbed a bug that's existed unbeknownst to anyone since 2.0.26_pre
where 'emerge -e world' could (and with autoclean did) empty the
world file of every package it merged. 'regenworld' is now available
to recreate the world file the best that can be done from the log
kept in /var/log/emerge.log.

etc-update automerges trivial (comments/whitespace) changes without
prompting, after you enable or merge the default config for it.

CBUILD is now used by econf() if it is defined. Sets --build=$CBUILD.

newdepend()/eclass RDEPEND issues fixed.

--NJ

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12

[Rainer Groesslinger]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:29:24 -0600
Nick Jones <carpaski@twobit.net> wrote:

> I just pushed portage-2.0.46-r12 out. I need some testers on it.
> It's mostly fixups on -r10/-r11 and should be free and clear of
> problems now. I'd like to unmask this ASAP, so test and lemme know.

I upgraded to 2.0.46-r12 a few minutes ago and I am merging gnome2.2 with it ATM. No problems so far (~10 packages are already compiled).

I even already found a bug because of the nice -vp thingy:
-vp told me that atk-1.2.2 uses +doc then I did -doc and atk compiled cleanly...Already filled a report on bugs.gentoo.org, of course ;)

Keep on implementing such features ;-)

Rainer

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12

[mikepolniak]

On 16:21 Fri 07 Feb     , Rainer Groesslinger wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:29:24 -0600
> Nick Jones <carpaski@twobit.net> wrote:
> 
> > I just pushed portage-2.0.46-r12 out. I need some testers on it.
> > It's mostly fixups on -r10/-r11 and should be free and clear of
> > problems now. I'd like to unmask this ASAP, so test and lemme know.
> 
> I upgraded to 2.0.46-r12 a few minutes ago and I am merging gnome2.2 with it ATM. No problems so far (~10 packages are already compiled).
> 
> I even already found a bug because of the nice -vp thingy:
> -vp told me that atk-1.2.2 uses +doc then I did -doc and atk compiled cleanly...Already filled a report on bugs.gentoo.org, of course ;)
> 
> Keep on implementing such features ;-)

I think -vp lists the IUSE flags, which are optional depends.

The atk ebuild has IUSE="doc" and

DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
	doc? ( >=dev-util/gtk-doc-0.9-r2 )
	>=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.12.0"


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12

[Ciaravino, Tido]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1483 bytes --]

i think you will HAVE to unmask it...

see bug# 15284

the short version is that i was installing a new system and not only did i
hit the
stupid missing digest bug # 15280 it failed during "scripts/bootstrap.sh"

the fix was to unmask 2.0.46-r12...

(and i love the -vp feature - now if only ALL the ebuilds used IUSE properly
...)


-----Original Message-----
From: mikepolniak [mailto:mikpolniak@adelphia.net]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:30 AM
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.46-r12


On 16:21 Fri 07 Feb     , Rainer Groesslinger wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:29:24 -0600
> Nick Jones <carpaski@twobit.net> wrote:
> 
> > I just pushed portage-2.0.46-r12 out. I need some testers on it.
> > It's mostly fixups on -r10/-r11 and should be free and clear of
> > problems now. I'd like to unmask this ASAP, so test and lemme know.
> 
> I upgraded to 2.0.46-r12 a few minutes ago and I am merging gnome2.2 with
it ATM. No problems so far (~10 packages are already compiled).
> 
> I even already found a bug because of the nice -vp thingy:
> -vp told me that atk-1.2.2 uses +doc then I did -doc and atk compiled
cleanly...Already filled a report on bugs.gentoo.org, of course ;)
> 
> Keep on implementing such features ;-)

I think -vp lists the IUSE flags, which are optional depends.

The atk ebuild has IUSE="doc" and

DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
	doc? ( >=dev-util/gtk-doc-0.9-r2 )
	>=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.12.0"


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2916 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 37 bytes --]

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list