From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-17656-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 7429 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2004 15:09:24 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Nov 2004 15:09:24 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1CXLFL-0007nb-TF
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:09:23 +0000
Received: (qmail 28715 invoked by uid 89); 25 Nov 2004 15:09:23 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 12113 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2004 15:09:23 +0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=oBZ2aseUoJ6tGNVBoBDrZQIQoLNPlZI1N3phI2U5gu7xKkNfhj3x08Nr6fjmBz15pUyrLcR4xB9MbyUJ7M8pTekClGBTQNm1iWubgCcD0Q2qF8ykkv9Y9uqH43HqtG6OahCiL7O3PQAwxD5HbTNbrBQOuHqzzioYTV04dWPuFgk=
Message-ID: <921ad39e041125070924222ffa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:09:22 -0500
From: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Schweizer <sschweizer@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@gentoo.org>, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, 
	devil@gentoo.org.ua
In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04112507077ce6e649@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <41A5DF33.4030407@gentoo.org>
	 <921ad39e041125060259114978@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e7963922041125060518a3e429@mail.gmail.com>
	 <921ad39e04112507077ce6e649@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] regarding app-rox (attempt n. 2)
X-Archives-Salt: 752af070-2a2c-4a41-8b04-8dd9f59c98b0
X-Archives-Hash: 652d6b5f030abbe78a47d823551f0adb

Also, anyone noticed that app-gnustep is empty? (except for some empty
file .helps_clean_this_dir_on_2.0.50)

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:07:42 -0500, Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:05:22 +0100, Stefan Schweizer
> 
> 
> <sschweizer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:02:54 -0500, Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I suppose what you want then is rox-base and possibly rox-extra or
> > > maybe rox-misc (like kde-misc).
> >
> > That makes 3 categories for a little bit more than 20 apps.
> > 
> Who said 3? -- I'm just saying take the common naming scheme. 1 will
> be enough, another one can be added later.
> 
> gnustep-base # ls | wc -l
> 7
> 
> xfce-base # ls | wc -l
> 15
> 
> He said around 20 ebuilds so makes perfect sense to have a rox-base
>

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list