From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10131 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2004 22:33:18 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Nov 2004 22:33:18 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CWMkI-0000Cl-Ql for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:33:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 16861 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2004 22:33:18 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4312 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2004 22:33:18 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=skPfeXopZnkuDzAG8Fn2mkyhDbm+VDK9198FmL1qVGJ3AxPclTgsM3M3Bbv5gGLoC20FD77FH+iymhL0FHVZ1L84xQ4OTwy9Cpb9g95POPSNMlmANlbJmjPxFGxuf8BM/kVfhxNWJGtORDpJ5RKI+LlS+reTq7V96HqeVVb/yhk= Message-ID: <921ad39e0411221432611608ab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:32:57 -0500 From: Roman Gaufman Reply-To: Roman Gaufman To: Daniel Ahlberg Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20041122024630.09EED3F8127@nea.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041122024630.09EED3F8127@nea.localnet> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords X-Archives-Salt: 681f7989-c5d0-4810-955c-0f0e4ae2a374 X-Archives-Hash: 9921ca9c937bb3a1967ba23024f12a2d Nothing under : TOP TEN: ======== Is this a bug? On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:46:30 +0100 (CET), Daniel Ahlberg wrote: > Hi, > > This is an automatically created email message. > http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 8882 ebuilds. > > The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: > * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. > * if an arch was in KEYWORDS in an older ebuild, but not in the newer ones. > * if SRC_URI contains hosts specified in thirdpartymirrors. > * if ebuild uses patch instead of epatch. > * if ebuild sets S to ${WORKDIR}/${P}. > * if ebuild redefines P, PV, PN or PF. > * If the use flags in the ebuild matches those in IUSE. > * If ebuild sets IUSE. > * if ebuild doesn't inherit eutils when it uses functions from eutils. > * if ebuild doesn't inherit flag-o-matic when it uses functions from flag-o-matic. > * if ebuild has $HOMEPAGE in SRC_URI (cosmetic). > * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic). > * if ebuild forces -fPIC flag to CFLAGS. > * if ebuild has deprecated WANT_AUTO(CONF|MAKE)_?_?. > * if ebuild uses is-flag -fPIC, should be changed to has_fpic. > * if ebuild appends $RDEPEND or $DEPEND to $RDEPEND or $DEPEND to $DEPEND. > * if ebuild has arch keyword(s) in iuse. > * if ebuild overrides MAKEOPTS. > * if ebuild has automake, autoconf or libtool in RDEPEND. > > TOP TEN: > ======== > > Questions and comments may be directed to aliz@gentoo.org. > > Script has been running for 106 minutes. > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list