From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5356 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2004 11:18:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 31 Oct 2004 11:18:34 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CODjG-0007wV-C3 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:18:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 15700 invoked by uid 89); 31 Oct 2004 11:18:33 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12854 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2004 11:18:33 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=R47LPMRHbVVXYa57kZ1rxt53FRYdKskUa/6188Gbqi+Csf/knwuJBvx0ixJLjrTFJNygt1+ChJYZIdqrUjjaT56k7CLux4BObxdSOfZWhsxwpmW8CdlE+D43q1vwTUr7Of+/6YzPuCzllN1lAsxpuB/UMCl40qGdmYuy+28jSqE= Message-ID: <921ad39e04103103187bf99f0c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:18:33 +0000 From: Roman Gaufman Reply-To: Roman Gaufman To: Henrik Brix Andersen Cc: Daniel Ahlberg , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1099214725.17978.20.camel@sponge.fungus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041030145454.92C1524ABB@orm.localnet> <1099214725.17978.20.camel@sponge.fungus> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords X-Archives-Salt: 6c0fafa4-136c-4b59-b9e3-d941a20d9e70 X-Archives-Hash: abd2cb4eb39b96d09783dffbe1ae3def Would make a very nice QA measure. Any outdated/broken ebuild could be auto reported to bugzilla and removed in 72 hours if no responce. I think gentoo really needs QA measures of this sort. Like in debian, packages get moved up from unstable to testing automatically if no critical reports were made for 2 weeks. This could have really great potential. Tests can be added to the script to track new discovered problems, then repoman can be tied down on the same system as this periodic test. Very nice idea indeed. Any chance we could see the code? On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:25:25 +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 16:53, Daniel Ahlberg wrote: > > This is an automatically created email message. > > http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 8758 ebuilds. > > Could someone please explain to me what the above mentioned site can be > used for? > > I've checked the site a few times, but my email isn't even listed in the > drop-down list, and the package entries for packages maintained by the > mobile herd (to which I am enslaved) are not exactly up-to-date. > > Sincerely, > Brix > -- > Henrik Brix Andersen > Gentoo Linux > > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list