From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A91138335 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84CA4E0B4A; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.sf-mail.de (mail.sf-mail.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:1c17:6fae:616d:6c69:616d:6c69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C193E0B21 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1129 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2020 09:53:05 -0000 Received: from dyn.ipv6.net-htp.de ([2a02:560:42ed:c900:5012:f09c:8503:9eb]:44258 HELO daneel.sf-tec.de) (auth=eike@sf-mail.de) by mail.sf-mail.de (Qsmtpd 0.36dev) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPSA for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:53:05 +0100 From: Rolf Eike Beer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:00:14 +0100 Message-ID: <9177847.t7M2BhH1to@daneel.sf-tec.de> In-Reply-To: <2B1E46E2-A1D6-4EAB-962E-FEB258B815A3@gentoo.org> References: <19015309.XG3PSQ8cOu@daneel.sf-tec.de> <2B1E46E2-A1D6-4EAB-962E-FEB258B815A3@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5599070.yWFPhyaRLz"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0105aa7f-a789-4e00-96ba-082b99d1de81 X-Archives-Hash: aaaece0c21beab93d3f5e91cc71a7adc --nextPart5599070.yWFPhyaRLz Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 03:40:35 CET schrieb Aaron Bauman: > On January 2, 2020 6:35:08 PM EST, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > >Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 00:25:06 CET schrieb Mike Pagano: > >> hppa is making us keep old kernels around [1]. Should the kernel team be > >> doing more to get your attention then CC'ing hppa on all of the kernel > >> STABLEREQ bugs [2]? > > > >I only run vanilla-sources since there are still lot of cache > >corruption > >problems in hppa kernels, or whatever makes them flaky. > > > >Linux pioneer 5.4.6-parisc64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 27 10:23:09 CET 2019 parisc64 > >PA8800 (Mako) 9000/785/C8000 GNU/Linux > >Linux voyager 5.4.6-parisc #1 Fri Dec 27 15:46:43 CET 2019 parisc PA8600 > >(PCX-W+) 9000/785/C3600 GNU/Linux > > > >So _I_ personally would say just drop old kernels, but that is in no > >way > >authorative. > Ugh. gentoo-sources is just a patch (trivial) on top of vanilla-kernel > sources of each stable and LTS version. If it's just that I could test them, but this still be no LTS version that I would look at. Just some background: these machines run CMake and some other software nightly builds, which starts ~3:00 and takes them until the afternoon. I have chroots for stabilization and keywording on them, and the tatt scripts will wait if any process of my buildbot user (that's just the name, not the software) is active. If the nightlies are done, then the tatt scripts will continue and hog the machine. I will do a kernel upgrade usually if the machine crashed anyway, which means every few weeks, and then I go to the most recent version. Eike --nextPart5599070.yWFPhyaRLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQSaYVDeqwKa3fTXNeNcpIk+abn8TgUCXg8QrgAKCRBcpIk+abn8 TmYwAKCbk8LL3qAtOXuX9KUbV+7yiBTkowCfShckyusGBVIl7jZ6hPbhD7R+nkU= =vs6u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5599070.yWFPhyaRLz--