From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:03:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90b936c0910081503h29bb0bbale75a059cffb178df@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ACE5AD2.1020306@gentoo.org>
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Stelian Ionescu wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
>>> keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
>>> neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
>>> and the list of ebuilds is attached. I plan on removing all these
>>> ebuilds two weeks from now unless a reason is given why not to. If you
>>> see an ebuild on the list that should be kept, please migrate it to EAPI
>>> 2. If you need assistance in migrating, I can help. With these gone
>>> built_with_use usage will be down to about 600:
>>
>> built_with_use shouldn't be removed until EAPI=3 gets approved because
>> currently there's no good way to emulate "--missing true|false|die"
>> yes, I can use something like this in sbcl:
>> || ( <sys-libs/glibc-2.6[nptl] >=sys-libs/glibc-2.6 )
>> but not all its use cases may be this simple
>>
>
> Even this is wrong because:
>
> betelgeuse@pena ~ $ portageq metadata / ebuild sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 IUSE
> nls
>
> For most packages old versions are not kept around so just doing
>>=cat/foo-X.Y[use] is fine and EAPI 3 is not needed. I haven't come
> across a case that couldn't be done with EAPI 2 yet. Granted the atoms
> can be a bit cleaner with EAPI 3 but considering how much zmedico slacks
> in implementing it, it's best to do migrating now with EAPI 2 than EAPI
Comments like these are not acceptable. Zac works his tail off on
portage. Please refrain from such comments in the future.
-Jeremy
> 3 in the far future.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-08 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 13:32 [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup Petteri Räty
2009-10-07 11:21 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-10-08 21:29 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-07 11:54 ` Stelian Ionescu
2009-10-08 21:34 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-08 22:03 ` Jeremy Olexa [this message]
2009-10-08 22:22 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-09 0:17 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-10-09 13:38 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-08 22:25 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2009-10-09 13:41 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-24 12:32 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] " Petteri Räty
2009-10-24 20:29 ` James Cloos
2009-10-25 9:48 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-26 23:21 ` James Cloos
2009-10-27 13:12 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-27 6:07 ` Ryan Hill
2009-10-27 7:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-27 13:09 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-27 13:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-27 18:46 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-28 2:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2009-10-28 9:51 ` Petteri Räty
2009-10-28 11:11 ` Alexis Ballier
2009-10-30 2:29 ` Doug Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90b936c0910081503h29bb0bbale75a059cffb178df@mail.gmail.com \
--to=darkside@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox