From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-35793-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1M4gOz-00051H-5O
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:15:33 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 096EAE0759;
	Thu, 14 May 2009 19:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qy0-f115.google.com (mail-qy0-f115.google.com [209.85.221.115])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB377E0759
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qyk13 with SMTP id 13so979386qyk.32
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=0yl00SqRPj7xdATyRsf5c/NpvGvIsF/lq1nyGU6pTGg=;
        b=jLugUAoq+Lza6NT5lbFayBETrZol3GerBELCk1euQTNSwxwCCVD3tE0INT9CmNl/an
         /CmiqcqRXDCmmFVHOlJLKtcTEJ0xRG3wZYMYHCmdR0pwo4ASUeVZ/znzpcCpxNj8uCFX
         9VDpVzqGg5Pf1DWBbBOX5yTfaPj7d7Cf6cDJ0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=It10bpFRxQBNEWzP6FxPLbAR6jxZQ5QjP2BPHwQ+zjGWp1Y0mLMVEh/RGBLwgiYY4j
         aWTCh7YkIWNl/1n5rN845MD9wq2Zjy0vmdT4AeW+DOfCU+Kid2L/3BHDIdRj+5jMRDaK
         lF+k67x0P8fnPtcGU2abXiB4IjwqyjFFf2Yr0=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jer.gentoo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.71.6 with SMTP id f6mr4101117vcj.99.1242328528669; Thu, 14 
	May 2009 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200905142006.20696.levertond@googlemail.com>
References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org>
	 <200905142006.20696.levertond@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:15:28 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 150c1a16a169d4bd
Message-ID: <90b936c0905141215m6a414986t5dd4bded7f58be5f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55
From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 83438f9b-29f1-46a4-864b-9cf23be53b79
X-Archives-Hash: 498a000a7887f35bdb84986464d74881

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM, David Leverton
<levertond@googlemail.com> wrote:
> yourself, "shell-like". =C2=A0 "printf -v EAPI 1" is perfectly valid shel=
l (at
> least if we decide to allow bash 3.1 features), and has the same effect

To stir things up:
Who decides this? There are more and more bash-3.1 features in the
tree and I brought it up to the Council months ago becase the PMS says
that only bash-3.0 is allowed but no one cares.

-Jeremy