From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34332-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LZU9u-00012q-Hn
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:55:02 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53889E030B;
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.247])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FDEE030B
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so2327863rvb.46
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:55:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=HlAdA08QF9+C8uDamg0fiRMH6GKwYqsCxa9wT+fYB8Q=;
b=EkfR1Kl/G12NyaQTSHgLF89vM0KmmI25LPwZ4QrxzK9dDMFf76HWo9aNb13HYh5iA6
tULAfn2nIFtDCwVFoXwvzkYnZrjMOF+afT1cj6jDGmEjB8RAB11zAjUI9BWtdhM+1mGs
XnCIYskPRL2hSlXx6kQjz9wlJP3CPaG61IidM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=LPpYqSFzAaPKcgCHXvvtLTj7sToZ5uq39kQ5UySjm1cihVMN/OSLDRuGM0VjjIX5Z0
s//El8sJN2Y//BcUFcTaHlddTOP/996qCxqUKjyQkLZlBtJTkeS7bRqtbs5k01LiOfeE
pMm1P13ZFpjM3VbOTZYJiEM4gKOJTgvPdKmGA=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jer.gentoo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.141.172.7 with SMTP id z7mr3405211rvo.128.1234893300693; Tue,
17 Feb 2009 09:55:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:55:00 -0600
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3a2a6b0fde7d0d36
Message-ID: <90b936c0902170955o5c300d7evc906ef02116097fc@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Time to remove app-shells/bash-completion-config
From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 48c6ad31-321b-4b5f-bd7a-9b6ad5b396b8
X-Archives-Hash: 5df2c89cd6e9919bc33be621fbce3af7
Hello,
I would like to request that bash-completion-20081218 to be marked
stable by the arches soon here.
In doing so, I'm going to make the following change to bash-completion.eclass:
-RDEPEND="bash-completion?
- ( || (
- app-admin/eselect
- app-shells/bash-completion-config
- )
- )"
+RDEPEND="bash-completion? ( app-admin/eselect )"
We should only be using eselect now to enable bash-completion. I think
bash-completion-config is broken now anyway
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253878). So, after this
change, I will p.mask b-c-c for removal.
Any concerns? The upgrade path in the future is going to be wierd as
upstream is releasing v1.0 soon, but that is not concern for now.
Thanks,
Jeremy