From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEC2I-00014Q-Kb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:05:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SL43II008600; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:04:03 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SL27aY004900 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:02:07 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5D6A55137 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:02:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23637-08-3 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:02:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581E0536A5D for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:02:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:02:39 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <905929917.20060228220239@gentoo.org> To: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role In-Reply-To: <200602281539.43661.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <200602281459.42324.vapier@gentoo.org> <904604312.20060228211037@gentoo.org> <200602281539.43661.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------FD8D73D8E0E8E" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.09 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.350, BAYES_20=-0.74] X-Spam-Score: -1.09 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: e703072e-f83c-4e66-80f0-49de48e70791 X-Archives-Hash: e5c1bfcf05bbcdba9acf08b049596e57 ------------FD8D73D8E0E8E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A28.2.2006, 21:39:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: > whats your point ? if an ebuild author wants to control the SLOT, then > they should be able to without having an invalid warning issued on the > subject > considering the nature of the warning, it should be trivial to make it in= to a > proper QA check by having the class see where files were installed and th= en=20 > warn/abort if certain conditions are met > there's no reason for the user to see this crap > -mike Yeah, and there's no reason for user to see USE_EXPAND QA notice crap, eclass inherited illegally crap and a couple of others - this isn't going anywhere. You are trying to solve something that noone ever complained about. Why not rather solve stuff like ebuilds that depend unconditionally on arts, but because they inherit kde eclass they get bogus arts use flag from the eclass. This is an issue that's truly confusing and that people are filing bugs about. There's the difference between doing something useful and wasting time on an artificially invented issue. -- jakub ------------FD8D73D8E0E8E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEBLpvhxfV/c66PZ4RAuorAKCozQU/R5eT0O4IaWWimKWOlqA99ACfcycH Fb2+r4lZf66kpaDPut6bwWA= =pNMY -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------FD8D73D8E0E8E-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list