From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53E0138334 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBED1E093A; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4D14E0922 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CC2A34B023; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9057c700a25bc730fcb192ffc92d2d5ea1d067a4.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Need ARM/AArch64 test data for cpuid2cpuflags From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: arm Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:52:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5d78974d83515_61723ae503440529@mercury.mail> References: <1ae2785f3891fd9fa3897bfd1ebdc73c330eee43.camel@gentoo.org> <5d78974d83515_61723ae503440529@mercury.mail> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yZlunakR1isHuPHOlZuK" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 81bbc333-669e-434a-89ad-f99354aaf91b X-Archives-Hash: 4c8897fc7f2593d6b763e905a61986c7 --=-yZlunakR1isHuPHOlZuK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 09:42 +0300, Nick Howell wrote: > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 22:44 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > If you have an ARM board and would like to help, please: > > >=20 > > > ./hwcap-dump > > >=20 > > > and send me the output along with 'uname -m'. TIA! > >=20 > > I'm sorry but sending it this late, I forgot two more important things: > >=20 > > 1. Name of the CPU or the board (i.e. something I can use to name > > the test). > >=20 > > 2. Output of cpuid2cpuflags, preferably verified against cpuinfo. >=20 > name: rk3288 >=20 > $ uname -m > armv7l >=20 > $ ./hwcap-dump > hwcap:00000000003fb8d7 > hwcap2:0000000000000000 >=20 > $ ./cpuid2cpuflags > CPU_FLAGS_ARM: edsp neon thumb vfp vfpv3 vfpv4 vfp-d32 v4 v5 v6 v7 thumb2 >=20 > $ grep -m1 Features /proc/cpuinfo > Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4 = idiva idivt vfpd32 lpae evtstrm=20 Thanks, included. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-yZlunakR1isHuPHOlZuK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl14mZhfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA7rjggAjkIRpWJaHUwmPd2cmVKKbo2t9tQXSs7yVmO3RHu9dUp7iSCvqk4pJF8+ O1PP6kG/TrnInMPT7LKFgJN0TcPulRc50ZjDlOtWCBe37FF4bZU5t58xnk4p4OH8 JBfvxi+z/sgKl25apEcncvpE14PPWykD9cqm7uhBHZ5RACY0thGy8pTaGIXOc8aq FbNEzmVjRswVFTfcdnYAy3kJOpqE4tyU+a3vqy/P5hQlaOeaPvC1nR0XxyQz2mQu 9e0aFgjfjEX7/JMdO1pdHWjjdcEJNxRMA0u4CRPAfL2tQMtGCjXy6ehakIWI1En7 qqRqykBMvQ92vAJIryihBr/qQHxieA== =yQaK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yZlunakR1isHuPHOlZuK--