From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEBGA-0000NT-T9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:15:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SKDjTm007552; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:13:45 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SKA5QS005737 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:10:05 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E040FA550F4 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02690-04-5 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D5AA55127 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:37 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <904604312.20060228211037@gentoo.org> To: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role In-Reply-To: <200602281459.42324.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <20060228171157.370ebf4b@snowdrop.home> <20060228175137.GG11818@toucan.gentoo.org> <200602281459.42324.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------127A4F91763235B" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.016 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=0.583, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.016 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 130fc266-3dc9-4662-a53c-c2f97d26d089 X-Archives-Hash: 86ff82904305c721a02410c54a684a05 ------------127A4F91763235B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A28.2.2006, 20:59:42, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:51, Renat Lumpau wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:11:57PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> > And it sticks out a nasty ewarn and says that the ebuild is probably >> > broken. >> >> Which it _probably_ is. See, this is a numbers game. In most cases, if y= ou >> use the webapp eclass, setting SLOT=3D"0" is incorrect. There are some c= ases >> in which it's just fine. Until FEATURES=3D"mindreader" is implemented, h= ow is >> the eclass to know what you're trying to do? So it prints a warning and >> doesn't die. Number of angry users storming bugs.g.o - 0. > why do you need to be a mindreader ? the user requested they control the= =20 > package, thus it isnt a bug, so dont issue a warning > -mike Sure, and when *ebuild* requested it instead, then portage will be automagically informed. So yeah, we can implement yet another variable into the eclass, and we can do tons of other magic voodoo about three lines of eclass that noone has ever noticed until today, and the whole thing can be a lot more complex for sure. Sorry, I call this a complete waste of time. --=20 jakub ------------127A4F91763235B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEBK49hxfV/c66PZ4RAquCAKCHZ/QiHJGl4G+ouRvKKyI8KEP4LgCfV8rj ragf7wXMTgX0ENncSxtnDsg= =q48S -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------127A4F91763235B-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list