From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D15E158064 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 09:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECA2A2BC083; Wed, 8 May 2024 09:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6CC2BC019 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 09:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <902ad0e5154d0c7993fcea2a2566db05f30b2fc5.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Gentoo Bugzilla: new resolution for bugs closed due to last rites From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 11:23:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0d9a35f44a050435d17c755b06dbc439956de674.camel@gentoo.org> References: <0d9a35f44a050435d17c755b06dbc439956de674.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mx7VDrpgyK7Kb66gZXpg" User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 8dcbcbd7-d859-42bf-b946-5e6a713668a9 X-Archives-Hash: c063605aa5d91f0cbc90401999f342ec --=-mx7VDrpgyK7Kb66gZXpg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 12:03 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I think we should add a new bug resolution that would more precisely > cover closing bugs due to packages being removed. Right now, whichever > resolution we use (be it WONTFIX, OBSOLETE, etc.), we aren't able to > easily distinguish whether the resolution was used "normally" or due to > last rites. >=20 > Having a dedicated resolution (technical name RESO/PKGREMOVED) would > make this clear. Furthermore, it would make it easier to reopen bugs > if the packages are ever reintroduced. >=20 > WDYT? >=20 Given no opposition, I've added RESO/PKGREMOVED now. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-mx7VDrpgyK7Kb66gZXpg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmY7RK8SHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOx/YH/j+V2kypFp2oPLktkZtvt6zS3t01WMBj Rq14u18OU5TK9ZO9Yfe68QDd962lPjYPZjW3wZSwqDQieoxy+tZ0Iv8sMKFPtpk9 usJDVmG6wqkQf14rjFP99VFvmmvw3zgqWgy46Jx22CAFYPmZQyhx7qriDsLyptFd 32YUgbK8Pj6jNeb2HDqJcSpsrBegOdQRZhthGLJY6NmXOShWNMR0I9DmcK6qPhTJ mpAk8TemUsICh8LZDA0Mwhfp1DAz3R0poiS5nsQ7RvqQEVvktFQ8mKQ2+LKtw9Fq sm1V5nYUxRA5BJxOWjCyx18a7a11EvyC5S6q1lzmh1KjJA17MtIuWAM= =2YmH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mx7VDrpgyK7Kb66gZXpg--