On 06/12/19 15:41, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500
>> Tim Harder <radhermit@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>>> it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;)
>>>> it will never be perfect but i really like repoman commit to refuse
>>>> to even commit if there's something obviously wrong
>>> I'm more of the opinion (and am working towards that practicality in
>>> terms of runtime speed) that a subset of QA checks should be run as a
>>> git hook which would cause push failures on certain classes of bad
>>> commits.
>>
>> There should be both. Amending the 23rd commit message because one
>> mistyped a semicolon is kind of a PITA.
> It is?
>
> git rebase -i HEAD~23
>
> Is that what you think is a pain in the ass, or do you not know about
> interactive rebase? :)
>
I hope you're not suggesting a rebase of any sort in gentoo.git, Matt .... ;)