From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FspHz-0004ZP-Lg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:05:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5KN4YPT011853; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:04:34 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5KN2CZe014085 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:02:12 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so1446381ugd for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AS2QfMHymSgrD62mT30fMcC+k+P1trdJDXaoO7RqHsaicWeHcdxOw4RFH4CTgWMe0Fxjfw4aLojDQaHJhPAOgcDcLWRJx3vKqbZmRQt5U/afoZI6dbS2I/1ggTO9+b2Zjp3ELLwIvOlG1CDfkM3RQP5UfLnT+uaZfvOdTQK5CkE= Received: by 10.67.89.5 with SMTP id r5mr2883978ugl; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.238.18 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f5ca2210606201602h4867b91dif9562e631c790239@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:02:11 -0700 From: "Mike Owen" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Archives-Salt: d1b39bf0-78dc-4ec0-baf0-ae234662495c X-Archives-Hash: 86b0deb57974d381b059416975a55318 On 6/20/06, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > Hi, > > with kde4 approaching and the new Qt-4 being in the tree we suddenly see the > same problems that gtk had with the gtk2 flag again. > >>From this user's perspective, simple is better. qt3 and qt4 as use flags are completely and utterly obvious as to what they mean, and there is no confusion about them. Adding a plain qt flag in there brings back the gtk/gtk2 mess that we've presumably been trying to avoid in the future. Mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list