From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MpNgV-0004vx-NP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:46:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64C27E0780; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FCEE0780 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so1435570bwz.34 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:46:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3tM57NQZUKwOX+DH45GhP9bVY/5weQgFHpcGvMRKVC4=; b=Ep4nqJfGI7JHE7rloqIWjvvhheIIYmOa1fi0mv4X816oWjoi7Z+FWdfkSMC1elgNyE 8GyXeLi7ku1Q/3DeFPf7PU6zEdQo5UALSMvoho+lBH43NHbZ6TjoMPiWw3q6kCUSHTxU /aYicCEnC/Qu0QuWuABX7jLhmm6uW/1WaxzpI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RQ2K0rAcRB9BDR5iIPAn1oSGworTNh32TTzEi2vmOBPE/MIYQtWLDIBgbO8t0aDHYP g3KCj9Fnc9OEkafztD4X944zOks2mEvTFimSC/dVF+UaAVzTSQd/vfmkNtWCWBV4Y/pD J9YZGygJU2EeEEwtI3+4eDyfdDy7lY/LQ8hZA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.100.203 with SMTP id z11mr107234fan.89.1253457997164; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:46:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909201242.20201.ali_bush@gentoo.org> References: <200909191848.33225.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20090919173126.0e18110f@gentoo.org> <8effd1fb0909191645q45348d6ek5af3e4351c0decaf@mail.gmail.com> <200909201242.20201.ali_bush@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:46:37 +0200 Message-ID: <8effd1fb0909200746q7c1931fcu90c7b0a816287062@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 From: Francesco R To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc X-Archives-Salt: 3e72a98f-3294-4903-b82e-2dad245681f9 X-Archives-Hash: 9b96db82bbe2c1abb045230aba1f4b55 --0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Alistair Bush wrote: > > > > Someone here want people install paludis? because when I've switched to > > python 3.0 just out of curiosity, it broke totally that python written > > package manager who is portage. > > So another package manager was needed to re-install a sane portage. > > No it wasn't. [1] You just didn't know that ( which is completely > understandable ). Just as you must not have understood the implications of > emerge -C python:2.6. I don't want to be mean but would you like to > enlighten > us as to how you managed to unemerge python:2.6 while using python3 when > portage didn't work with python3. > > [1] > http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/amd64/dev-lang/python-2.6.2- > r1.tbz2 > > I did not unmerge > > > Still, do you really want to have it in tree as stable? Really? > > Yes really. > > what said in the previous message which you snipped, eselect python should forget about >=python-3 is still valid IMHO --0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Alistai= r Bush <ali_bus= h@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Someone here want people install paludis? because when I've switch= ed to
> python 3.0 just out of curiosity, it broke totally that python written=
> package manager who is portage.
> So another package manager was needed to re-install a sane portage.
No it wasn't. [1] =A0You just didn't know that ( which is com= pletely
understandable ). =A0Just as you must not have understood the implications = of
emerge -C python:2.6. =A0I don't want to be mean but would you like to = enlighten
us as to how you managed to unemerge python:2.6 while using python3 when portage didn't work with python3.

[1] http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-l= inux/amd64/dev-lang/python-2.6.2-
r1.tbz2

I did not unmerge <python-3, I was in hard multita= sking mode so I could not reconstruct how it broken so badly, also tinderbo= x packages work better if the CFLAGS used are the same, which is not always= true.
=A0
>
> Still, do you really want to have it in tree as stable? Really?

Yes really.

what said in the previous message which you snipped, ese= lect python should forget about >=3Dpython-3 is still valid IMHO
--0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc--