From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-37766-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MpNgV-0004vx-NP
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:46:46 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64C27E0780;
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FCEE0780
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:46:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so1435570bwz.34
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=3tM57NQZUKwOX+DH45GhP9bVY/5weQgFHpcGvMRKVC4=;
b=Ep4nqJfGI7JHE7rloqIWjvvhheIIYmOa1fi0mv4X816oWjoi7Z+FWdfkSMC1elgNyE
8GyXeLi7ku1Q/3DeFPf7PU6zEdQo5UALSMvoho+lBH43NHbZ6TjoMPiWw3q6kCUSHTxU
/aYicCEnC/Qu0QuWuABX7jLhmm6uW/1WaxzpI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=RQ2K0rAcRB9BDR5iIPAn1oSGworTNh32TTzEi2vmOBPE/MIYQtWLDIBgbO8t0aDHYP
g3KCj9Fnc9OEkafztD4X944zOks2mEvTFimSC/dVF+UaAVzTSQd/vfmkNtWCWBV4Y/pD
J9YZGygJU2EeEEwtI3+4eDyfdDy7lY/LQ8hZA=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.100.203 with SMTP id z11mr107234fan.89.1253457997164; Sun,
20 Sep 2009 07:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200909201242.20201.ali_bush@gentoo.org>
References: <200909191848.33225.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
<20090919173126.0e18110f@gentoo.org>
<8effd1fb0909191645q45348d6ek5af3e4351c0decaf@mail.gmail.com>
<200909201242.20201.ali_bush@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:46:37 +0200
Message-ID: <8effd1fb0909200746q7c1931fcu90c7b0a816287062@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1
From: Francesco R <vivo75@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc
X-Archives-Salt: 3e72a98f-3294-4903-b82e-2dad245681f9
X-Archives-Hash: 9b96db82bbe2c1abb045230aba1f4b55
--0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Alistair Bush <ali_bush@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > Someone here want people install paludis? because when I've switched to
> > python 3.0 just out of curiosity, it broke totally that python written
> > package manager who is portage.
> > So another package manager was needed to re-install a sane portage.
>
> No it wasn't. [1] You just didn't know that ( which is completely
> understandable ). Just as you must not have understood the implications of
> emerge -C python:2.6. I don't want to be mean but would you like to
> enlighten
> us as to how you managed to unemerge python:2.6 while using python3 when
> portage didn't work with python3.
>
> [1]
> http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/amd64/dev-lang/python-2.6.2-
> r1.tbz2
>
> I did not unmerge <python-3, I was in hard multitasking mode so I could not
reconstruct how it broken so badly, also tinderbox packages work better if
the CFLAGS used are the same, which is not always true.
> >
> > Still, do you really want to have it in tree as stable? Really?
>
> Yes really.
>
> what said in the previous message which you snipped, eselect python should
forget about >=python-3 is still valid IMHO
--0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Alistai=
r Bush <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:ali_bush@gentoo.org">ali_bus=
h@gentoo.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;=
padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">><br>
> Someone here want people install paludis? because when I've switch=
ed to<br>
> python 3.0 just out of curiosity, it broke totally that python written=
<br>
> package manager who is portage.<br>
> So another package manager was needed to re-install a sane portage.<br=
>
<br>
</div>No it wasn't. [1] =A0You just didn't know that ( which is com=
pletely<br>
understandable ). =A0Just as you must not have understood the implications =
of<br>
emerge -C python:2.6. =A0I don't want to be mean but would you like to =
enlighten<br>
us as to how you managed to unemerge python:2.6 while using python3 when<br=
>
portage didn't work with python3.<br>
<br>
[1] <a href=3D"http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/amd64/dev-lang=
/python-2.6.2-" target=3D"_blank">http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-l=
inux/amd64/dev-lang/python-2.6.2-</a><br>
r1.tbz2<br>
<br></blockquote><div>I did not unmerge <python-3, I was in hard multita=
sking mode so I could not reconstruct how it broken so badly, also tinderbo=
x packages work better if the CFLAGS used are the same, which is not always=
true.<br>
=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid =
rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div cla=
ss=3D"im">
><br>
> Still, do you really want to have it in tree as stable? Really?<br>
<br>
</div>Yes really.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>what said in the previous message which you snipped, ese=
lect python should forget about >=3Dpython-3 is still valid IMHO<br>
--0015174c1b96a972570474036ebc--