On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Alistair Bush <ali_bush@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Someone here want people install paludis? because when I've switched to
> python 3.0 just out of curiosity, it broke totally that python written
> package manager who is portage.
> So another package manager was needed to re-install a sane portage.

No it wasn't. [1]  You just didn't know that ( which is completely
understandable ).  Just as you must not have understood the implications of
emerge -C python:2.6.  I don't want to be mean but would you like to enlighten
us as to how you managed to unemerge python:2.6 while using python3 when
portage didn't work with python3.

[1] http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/amd64/dev-lang/python-2.6.2-
r1.tbz2

I did not unmerge <python-3, I was in hard multitasking mode so I could not reconstruct how it broken so badly, also tinderbox packages work better if the CFLAGS used are the same, which is not always true.
 
>
> Still, do you really want to have it in tree as stable? Really?

Yes really.

what said in the previous message which you snipped, eselect python should forget about >=python-3 is still valid IMHO