From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33FC4138334 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC08AE093A; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68CBBE091B for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74C1F34AF1A for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go 1.13 and go modules To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20190909173418.GA30003@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: <8e65e3de-216a-8709-f882-51d95853df0b@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 14:54:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 9fb2b8a6-3623-42a4-80de-6fe87526fa93 X-Archives-Hash: 589d60b1c07d39e0388437d619723e0a On 9/9/19 2:19 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > >> There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to >> src_unpack for go packages. > > If you do that then it will violate FEATURES=network-sandbox (default) > unless you also do PROPERTIES+=" live". > > We could add a separate PROPERTIES value for this, I've suggested it > before but both Michał Górny and Ulrich Mueller were against it: > This is the precisely what FEATURES=network-sandbox exists to prevent. Bundling dependencies, hitting the network, shelling out to a language-specific package manager, depending on specific upstream commits, and sidestepping existing QA mechanisms to make this all possible... it's bad idea bingo.