From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24220-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HxdNd-0005r2-D0
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:27:58 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5B6QfEH008147;
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:26:41 GMT
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5B6NSrm003283
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:23:28 GMT
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so3387992pyb
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=RbaBE42kbXTi3ADNNlo7+JDAsLkuqNCdn6w+1LBIxdQYZ0XUg+KH9jJzvOymL9B8DftbbZ6i+j+RKrpIWTZoTOFugEjDp80WjyzhwrXox38K1JVXDu7ZVrhyNVmg/VAO8st2Bw6rqfVAcQv0s3vj8gbudKrWMM/Ze87DJFj5szk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=G4JaxOq1py3r5BpaYj82eVGCM5SRSG/j3iNcQlmpkrsoP3ihVXJxgci7Wbfak6snqKD01rCWJRGvzWzD149CjSqSh+N5DQgAjRin2VG6bc8kZAYxOG6KtWFamz+hdFVC9pwTdYDZ0sMCnZddIqfN8OpW0cYLKmkl9xSnM8fwiHA=
Received: by 10.65.124.8 with SMTP id b8mr6525739qbn.1181543007387;
Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.251.19 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8cd1ed20706102323q4a5f8342pe2592a58e64978bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:23:27 +1200
From: "Kent Fredric" <kentfredric@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML
In-Reply-To: <f4iffh$6ra$1@sea.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4667A38B.7070308@gentoo.org> <f4hn26$cka$1@sea.gmane.org>
<20070611021535.GE5778@seldon> <f4iffh$6ra$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 97ac9e51-74cb-4d24-a41f-40b3656f99d3
X-Archives-Hash: 5a9a64382dc04e98cc43c809dbba161d
On 6/11/07, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 3) said increase means proctors/devrel have more work (meaning more
> > random outbursts at the proctors/devrel when folks realize that they
> > *are* going to enforce the behaviour rules, and that the outburstes
> > can be punished too).
>
> It should probably be made clear beforehand then that these rules are
> still in effect.
>
A semi processed Idea: Instead of proctors using censorship on
selected persons, and seeing that the -politics/-project channel will
attract more flies than others, if the proctors whish to provide a
totally unbiased form of temporary censorship, they could just rate
limit /all/ users uniformly untill its been ascertained that the
heat/problem/troll has died down/diminish/quit
I propose a logarithmic binary back-off strategy, so it wont penalize
people unless they're intending on posting more than twice ;)
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNOSPicAMreil kdrtf@gma.com"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list