From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HxdNd-0005r2-D0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:27:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5B6QfEH008147; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:26:41 GMT Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5B6NSrm003283 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:23:28 GMT Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so3387992pyb for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:23:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RbaBE42kbXTi3ADNNlo7+JDAsLkuqNCdn6w+1LBIxdQYZ0XUg+KH9jJzvOymL9B8DftbbZ6i+j+RKrpIWTZoTOFugEjDp80WjyzhwrXox38K1JVXDu7ZVrhyNVmg/VAO8st2Bw6rqfVAcQv0s3vj8gbudKrWMM/Ze87DJFj5szk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G4JaxOq1py3r5BpaYj82eVGCM5SRSG/j3iNcQlmpkrsoP3ihVXJxgci7Wbfak6snqKD01rCWJRGvzWzD149CjSqSh+N5DQgAjRin2VG6bc8kZAYxOG6KtWFamz+hdFVC9pwTdYDZ0sMCnZddIqfN8OpW0cYLKmkl9xSnM8fwiHA= Received: by 10.65.124.8 with SMTP id b8mr6525739qbn.1181543007387; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.251.19 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cd1ed20706102323q4a5f8342pe2592a58e64978bd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:23:27 +1200 From: "Kent Fredric" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4667A38B.7070308@gentoo.org> <20070611021535.GE5778@seldon> X-Archives-Salt: 97ac9e51-74cb-4d24-a41f-40b3656f99d3 X-Archives-Hash: 5a9a64382dc04e98cc43c809dbba161d On 6/11/07, Ryan Hill wrote: > > 3) said increase means proctors/devrel have more work (meaning more > > random outbursts at the proctors/devrel when folks realize that they > > *are* going to enforce the behaviour rules, and that the outburstes > > can be punished too). > > It should probably be made clear beforehand then that these rules are > still in effect. > A semi processed Idea: Instead of proctors using censorship on selected persons, and seeing that the -politics/-project channel will attract more flies than others, if the proctors whish to provide a totally unbiased form of temporary censorship, they could just rate limit /all/ users uniformly untill its been ascertained that the heat/problem/troll has died down/diminish/quit I propose a logarithmic binary back-off strategy, so it wont penalize people unless they're intending on posting more than twice ;) -- Kent ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x| print "enNOSPicAMreil kdrtf@gma.com"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}' -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list