From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938C71382C5 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CF95E0936; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F512E092D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (ipservice-092-214-198-247.092.214.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.214.198.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chithanh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 155E7335C79 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailing list moderation and community openness To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <4aab96fa-0edb-6a28-791e-28e2103f2a30@gentoo.org> <20180320152848.2uzqzvotaqk5hlnm@gentoo.org> <64b20a39-5692-8899-2cf4-5d04f99dc328@gentoo.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ch=c3=ad-Thanh_Christopher_Nguy=e1=bb=85n?= Message-ID: <8c071bea-5848-2bf7-3e36-aa783c09ee62@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:56:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <64b20a39-5692-8899-2cf4-5d04f99dc328@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 75837f05-a733-4ab3-9fb8-af6c591c00d1 X-Archives-Hash: b2cd4ce7a6081cdb67e64d1760b5909c Kristian Fiskerstrand schrieb: > Switching to mailman might have some good merits on its own, but as I > understand it it isn't necessary for the proposal at hand, that can be > solved using access control lists in mlmmj-process? I would advise caution that Council better not try to micro-manage Infra here. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn