From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39859-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NnxRP-0005IR-Vm
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:05:40 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC473E0D67;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2010 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com [74.125.83.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E59E0D6D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Mar 2010 17:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so1289602pvc.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:05:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=3bRW9LSaA4u/x25JpAEIulYT1rWZKnyIWFreFbl2lVE=;
        b=DFCg1iaP9tmDiB/GRCvMU4P9cYXM19FasE05jQKODfcGXfw7Hq5FnukJzVtDalmv6w
         nLc501iKoTkcrk4XSnqNTC7fIEM7lN8zLD2xIuDZy9tAcNVveDl6YW59bTdO8x0TY2sw
         s3KmHwKFJA6CXbxylubtRfLCAPeuF+j1NymOE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=HiNGWmNlNFvnlMh5IIiuG6JjwnUDhXvb+exgPwGvTKp7SV2+uhciliBzoVJQb1JxzH
         M+v1AGLN4YnrimjBxcU/cRcZkLbKKgQ/o08ZJSSsm/flpNjvJaRVQuEVOMKn3IgY690u
         +8cGUxv+ISz+gH3JtaP/c0dF+9E/QFqGCjD48=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.255.13 with SMTP id c13mr1673763rvi.152.1267895120444; 
	Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:05:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e117dbb91003060332h7d45b6c0rae69568be07e3619@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e117dbb91003011324j1d3df0cfndc74d1e711b71fae@mail.gmail.com>
	 <201003052151.22506.reavertm@gmail.com>
	 <e117dbb91003051306q77f01b3fl6e9809cb41ab87e3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8b4c83ad1003060111j4e2788dfg419f3ae234242017@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e117dbb91003060332h7d45b6c0rae69568be07e3619@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 22:35:20 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ab170b328b2da65b
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad1003060905q39a5dbdbp8e8c2e25c19ad3c8@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve 
	circular deps
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 4a01b734-7d66-4c36-86ce-214f901ca897
X-Archives-Hash: 29c88acbd447478c93a31e07abf9bf7e

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Would it be possible to make cups a PDEPEND in gtk+ or is it really
> needed at compile time?
>

cups is definitely needed at compile-time

> The same for cups: can we make poppler a PDEPEND? Maciej, did
> you get any further with looking into that?
>

>From what I can see in cups-1.3.11, pdftops is purely a runtime
dependency. The configure flags enable code that doesn't need pdftops
at compile-time. Infact, poppler[utils] is in pure RDEPEND to reflect
that. So in total, I think it can be moved to PDEPEND.

This change should be made to all ebuilds; not just the latest ~arch
since people do install stable ;p


-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team