From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39848-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Nnq8h-0007fr-FD
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:17:39 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 731C3E0A9C;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2010 09:17:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89932E08A0
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Mar 2010 09:17:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1so704533pwi.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:17:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=roKxxv7izuck8RUybqVJqXQZrSnmKl6FM3sySG05NG4=;
        b=Lah3YWXghAHgPqcd6b87os4ZUlLOcMm+tR17WJzYylDbiAbPiorY/ongX945n7iNXl
         FHu4Zodkz1aAFCM2cXOyiEWefAvSk0V4rTN4S0t2iNqnUGDECf+sSrynOj1M6JoOUCcs
         fC74JbVBdzdBbD73cLMpxErRx16yH0pPvb2ks=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=qIuG9/7oFdIoDXRr4zBxjFbediC0LoJkrPtcl7rLRTYBTMsKDTUN7Mv0itNZLMmm14
         xNpOYY1Az2lyUkeipWnGwVIHjztbBqpeYlkuMtGPFNya7sNaQsd0SeEI36psXsNdXi/A
         JAfjmA96scFJeJNTIgY4Rg3qX05kWQTFN7HyA=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.141.15.10 with SMTP id s10mr1419928rvi.40.1267867050989; Sat, 
	06 Mar 2010 01:17:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e117dbb91003051306q77f01b3fl6e9809cb41ab87e3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e117dbb91003011324j1d3df0cfndc74d1e711b71fae@mail.gmail.com>
	 <201003052151.22506.reavertm@gmail.com>
	 <e117dbb91003051306q77f01b3fl6e9809cb41ab87e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:47:30 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a3fd1dde8fb119a6
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad1003060117g234f3edfh5373ef82fceadbee@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve 
	circular deps
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 28fe6fed-6f15-49eb-917e-02e7d89d8077
X-Archives-Hash: 8e4b4ed694d44e09a8bc0e717ebedc67

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 5 March 2010 21:51, Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless.
>
> We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you
> are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to
> our users. I would like to prevent splitting, and see if we can fix maybe
> the cups ebuild instead.

There's nothing wrong with back-tracking on decisions if they seem to
cause problems. For instance, the mozilla herd has done a lot of
flip-flop on the system/internal sqlite issue, and we explained the
reasons to our users[1] and they agreed that it was useful, and a good
decision.

If it turns out there is no easier way of properly fixing this, we may
have to split poppler-utils out from poppler. In this regard, I like
how people like Maciej are spending efforts to solve the problem in
new ways (PDEPEND, etc)

1. http://is.gd/9O3k2

-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team