From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39847-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Nnq2v-0006n6-Vg
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:11:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DB06E09F4;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2010 09:11:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com [74.125.83.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913FAE09E3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Mar 2010 09:11:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so1238151pvc.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:11:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Mm0hRW+AkJY6akW5w2L7JQI3Bgn/66ayxnyThOJ+2Ec=;
        b=CNPBIE3MDFpERHzm8OUlVvRp43EAot0pQgDcEs+SDmN0BI8+NqitHyBgzwNUBKmKju
         kJQQewLTpm2e+pDG8nGOpZUgVu8pUGqCwHEjslCydnyOdJh1jDRpW3iFc+omfavGUaDL
         aDevzKM6y3SEPzCXrbeOXfU2/2IMklJ69sF10=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=KvnPqtREHwtEsVX6A5R4DopAwDb8tUxQfGVWjGni+Z3703My9z9zoHsWvyy5AXDp4K
         2+4pnWhu4qN//L2222oLTyk/T+DeLdlEn2H0cCyi4FE0+V8KF+YnrNT/tKvDHSqHrwee
         N+mvLpNycVQipyqK/7gPSbcwtlIu5tykBn5rs=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.141.125.11 with SMTP id c11mr1373403rvn.34.1267866671002; Sat, 
	06 Mar 2010 01:11:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e117dbb91003051306q77f01b3fl6e9809cb41ab87e3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e117dbb91003011324j1d3df0cfndc74d1e711b71fae@mail.gmail.com>
	 <201003052151.22506.reavertm@gmail.com>
	 <e117dbb91003051306q77f01b3fl6e9809cb41ab87e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:41:10 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7f014d9ef2c9b22a
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad1003060111j4e2788dfg419f3ae234242017@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve 
	circular deps
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: a48bd2fb-0aa8-490d-885a-75aa078612ca
X-Archives-Hash: f650915e6126f85c7635a7ec0524554e

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless.
>
> We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you
> are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to
> our users. I would like to prevent splitting, and see if we can fix maybe
> the cups ebuild instead. Or maybe the gtk+ maintainers want to split
> up their package... I understand they like that sort of thing.
>

These kind of pot-shots at Mart and the GNOME team are not welcome.
Please desist from making such unproductive statements. This is
precisely how flames begin, and this thread already has too much
heated argument going on.


-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team