From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVYBp-0001Pk-GN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:29:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C552E0BFE; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E724E0BFE for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so4525383pwj.26 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:29:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=p58yfa+FiTxDFCn2Jmg464+QXYv6H225YhjtROpkV7k=; b=emGMU6ye2TQmDM4NCgpJ4UxHMZrDJwMoS7j/M0xdaAm+RKXZ2v7oSc5TXwOQNuApgf uG7jgb6KpbSqmVXR4EPjrYvC0iRhDDIGJQjQ8ffc4I+/tz7VpROVx3lLQDmnWbM429ue HSV2fJxS8+GhQy+P48JNv0FoC/kqLGJmC5qMA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LjBIBN5AYI6ROD5ENF+i8/S8BC0XfaN6Fp33nHnmeJ6t16PRhGqsj32JI+ULDWwjkz xHwT/k34+/9uPoQp9UlWILs2hxXK88O8m7fkhGlIeSiN2TpnoPj5Dzr1UUPs45y0hAhU wQlqOdl0TqhR/zz757gb0Mv0ibleKK3T235Xg= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.188.21 with SMTP id l21mr974778waf.138.1263508140922; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:29:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad1001141421y22e416b8q4e5e4c9d47f4821f@mail.gmail.com> References: <201001112305.16532.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <201001122149.11091.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <201001131054.03953.vapier@gentoo.org> <8b4c83ad1001140449k49995e0ra01eeca16167735a@mail.gmail.com> <4B4F7F1B.4080902@the-cell.co.uk> <8b4c83ad1001141421y22e416b8q4e5e4c9d47f4821f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:59:00 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2ab5f2bb3d972a79 Message-ID: <8b4c83ad1001141429w33558119o9a19059ae181475b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: eac8ce86-e932-4aad-a810-f7ff95a27362 X-Archives-Hash: 49491e1b3f641abb49a7288bdc719784 On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > My bad. I did the tests a while back, and the number "30,000" is > actually for the no. of ebuilds in portage. The no. of files is > actually ~113,000 (difference comes because every package has a > manifest+changelog+metadata.xml+patches). Further refinement: ~92,000 Removed metadata/ (-28,000 which won't be around in the git tree), and ChangeLog (-13,000 which would be redundant, and should be auto-generated alongwith metadata prior to distribution via rsync. Hey, this is something that needs to be done too!) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team