From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38799-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NLtsn-00013Z-9K
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:37:45 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A55BE06DF;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com (mail-px0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A769E06DF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so2592788pxi.11
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:36:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=WsqntihU8zA4MrBJ0IA8XvzvOD4801wmU/5psJ1BZxo=;
        b=h6ObRE7+uFYBX5xct2+HH3dfoKMAMDIftov9Qn1dRsv6NHd4iJx37pqdWoNLZ9gYlD
         pPs6905WVx76SKQmgvHkGpEMf9pEjeYY7eJsCUVTIhb20qlTwBMdZHQoTmosX2/2gURy
         Rzebfe36xd3xdz7wrZRjxknEz31BK1Cvuv4Lc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=dB/a6DCme/307zeAgvbkKHEoSLuvTpuM0LyYbliOqUDA8LM6XxNo6801f24rO6IZMe
         ySVtd+hm0nlPYIDvR/ETyZ7Zb5LXuVQkBfw489FFyOxQaxWrD2VMP8ybsl1aMAAej5t+
         fM5VtMiSzcXHQEGkbBDQMbhLAVDQppsowsMOc=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.45.8 with SMTP id s8mr3248195was.85.1261208182755; Fri, 18 
	Dec 2009 23:36:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200912181407.47924.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <200912181407.47924.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:06:22 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 09e0f27f3ede8ba3
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0912182336s42524ac3ka1105121bd477157@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 3ade4850-cdba-4710-b1f4-29f77b84e3b6
X-Archives-Hash: c10fb7c4e3fc2c1ae1abb68f219122fc

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. =C2=A0se=
ems to
> work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release:

Wouldn't it be safer to let this run on, say, Patrick's or Deigo's
tinderboxes for a day or so before pushing this to eutils?

Murphy's law becomes more applicable as the affected domain of a
change increases :)

--=20
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team