From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38364-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1N6Pdq-0004vT-V3
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:18:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0363E0A5C;
	Fri,  6 Nov 2009 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B41DE0A5C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  6 Nov 2009 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so709575pwj.26
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:18:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=h8w2Zs2JHU/ADpLDB/sbyA0M/GgnW+a0Hihhhn9DPLA=;
        b=tUsQc4pg3thqaQKN8ABUYzAYYaCSdb33C6CWwJqT4jYfTaz9T6tlWQ2NAziBQzwVmn
         92cw/axd/XJ0dZGJ2+GB+90d+CVt9KL47XAaUCFT4SEBcDnEVS1120mlo+1FGd4j4BIk
         uOoqAdrBe/SulxO522E2WAhABPu7dxACETimA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=b3oBsdYEhj/TOMAmPtleQ5u+v6mKUa2jkCkja1Fpq6ZjGjGUuttS/vONIInGLGOOPQ
         9LlVTw2xQmq3tKHCIwBAtFgdFn9K34wgQYG/5crBIk0cctxPcBiWgcm+176DoRjasLtp
         Ct+WAA6ctROYPAKV3mvsB5k+1D3F1hVMd73F4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.6.25 with SMTP id 25mr6810819waf.25.1257517097095; Fri, 06 
	Nov 2009 06:18:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4AF331B0.4020108@gentoo.org>
References: <200911011736.38401.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
	 <20091102151707.0b155aab@gentoo.org>
	 <200911021724.01069.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
	 <20091103191005.18d98e2e@gentoo.org>
	 <e117dbb90911040436h249ce099s1bd09367b932f1bb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4AF1EBD8.4020502@gentoo.org> <20091104214823.64842abd@gentoo.org>
	 <20091105091700.GA17478@eric.schwarzvogel.de>
	 <4AF331B0.4020108@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:48:16 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8f6b832b500d8c61
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0911060618r2b61c4b4w51238306b9c9a437@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: df49acfd-3db5-4c16-9a6f-342702e234d2
X-Archives-Hash: bb7e779e47d1b205300d192b003955f4

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri R=C3=A4ty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> w=
rote:
> In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark
> Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The
> probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not
> so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch
> teams have problems keeping up.
>

I think the same should be extended to other languages such as Perl
and Python (unless they have portions which are C/C++)


--=20
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team