From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1My1tQ-0000yt-Pr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:19:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DB23E08A6; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-px0-f201.google.com (mail-px0-f201.google.com [209.85.216.201]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E87E08A6 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so1007474pxi.10 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:19:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1m19De3/PQaWbDrYBPYXJyiHvHaeeSQWbc6cqxbtNkY=; b=xh2OSEM2ZKNgkg7vio17y5ypuBFJ2pg+WVTrSR979exMXMWk+OBNBRmCHEA8JV9fld UASo//6ADRywXGEQCxcCwmXjgKTo/n/fmvpcoQmAddqVB8pgRLqsDUiH9JHCTOLqK6fG AxVNvhDVgl7q6QN8RSqh578oiGW2D4H4K/5vc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wfwrO1ksuni7RWkFHSwOBQckwVe1sLZmYmI6FnPd21EKp75FSwDtOWmXO/GOoF40OA WV8LRiihECeknKBFIXoBMhaw4/l7paheXEWSeJEOY3pHe1FP5le5/OiOFzCtJSEHw5bu F5Ox0OSYIQA655W7BTnUYjDytoKrRJZK4Bg7o= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.115.81.21 with SMTP id i21mr15037604wal.125.1255519182351; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:19:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091014031037.4a3b023b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <4AD4E907.5060405@gentoo.org> <20091013163052.11d25cec@angelstorm> <200910132017.54281.vapier@gentoo.org> <20091014003335.GA20367@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20091014031037.4a3b023b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:49:42 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9da777d053ec83a5 Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0910140419w270d26e7lf1d37d920f851ab7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 1c1c6092-e72d-41f2-904c-aab8d2dbc6ce X-Archives-Hash: b680414b09004c65372b9131126e3feb [completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replying] On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, > we've seen many more bugs that only got discovered when the tree was > synced with some developer overlay, or when a Great Unveiling was done > after limited, private, small scale testing (as with many GNOME and KDE > releases, not to point the finger). If GNOME is involved, I would like you to point some fingers and tell us exactly where you think we went wrong; exactly which "Great Unveiling" are you talking about? If you don't tell us what we did wrong, you surely can't expect us to fix the problem :) All GNOME releases are incremental, so in 99% of the cases, the migration path is straightforward. If as an hppa arch dev, if you were inconvenienced, we would like to correct the problem since it would've definitely affected other archs too (and we know how understaffed you guys are :) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team