From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38014-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MwbuL-0000xO-2I
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:22:49 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 737FAE0806;
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:22:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pz0-f174.google.com (mail-pz0-f174.google.com [209.85.222.174])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49522E0806
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:22:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so3970821pzk.32
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=VvOZ1CNZ6AZ3H3eEexVSKcE35dIWjtmcoc7/jTmjxIU=;
b=lFvylIDOakGT0786V3/SmK9N9zurN6rv93FV6uYZrxB/n/3OQfBUVUz/ib7AJPNsP0
unfAp8DCGZoK8S9nDvzkVvr/V2f5kllW82wF2Z43xk/6c8O2L0IJNmRYlMCEsc682gld
HlVclwTK1Vf2fsKt/3b+3eBCW+IpDwYQJe12M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=Epkd7tr3PLob5C1rSSYrMW8xqNdNoDygYcSqJ3EF3B5JObU1CM0PcklEUNxqOSerN7
fnbcHFMUMNOFPivSOC+laWqK4yd2qeq5u/Jwo5VazRRjrvBtn+z6JAuigLZj/vWL32i+
x/PxZMhuDYn8ALcELZBF+9MMfJCX1C51MuHjQ=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.115.116.4 with SMTP id t4mr2721034wam.106.1255180966876; Sat,
10 Oct 2009 06:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AD08859.8020806@gentoo.org>
References: <200910091957.09193.zzam@gentoo.org> <4AD08859.8020806@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:52:46 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: f0619a43a5d2d6c4
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0910100622u502a69bdy6a9aaca18304cd48@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: fe6359a6-a51e-45c9-a945-03847bc61bd6
X-Archives-Hash: ceb8657f06642484db5603e7e034525b
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Alin N=C4=83stac <mrness@gentoo.org> wrote=
:
> On 10/9/09 7:57 PM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
>> * does new scripts already can do all that was possible with net.* ?
>>
> No. PPP is not compatible with the new scripts.
>
Major regression. It never pays to drop surprises on people like this.
I *strongly* suggest masking openrc-0.5.1 until the documentation is
updated and a news file is sent.
--=20
~Nirbheek Chauhan
GNOME+Mozilla Team, Gentoo