From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mn4Df-0007FW-9A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:35:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 486F5E0856; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-px0-f184.google.com (mail-px0-f184.google.com [209.85.216.184]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A393E0856 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi14 with SMTP id 14so2217094pxi.9 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:35:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=O7lrygoAei2W5lDLa+8oVguK3p6/112xBuzQ/ZHVtc8=; b=Vqkpb38Qre430BebKhYV8hx+E4QSG1vtw3gLAZo/Tgvw8SL9+PM3u598/TW+huZ6dF o9tCBQPU9Q+RZzbLxGflH2WVwSXVbP5okh4fUADukj4EWSunAXoRMv2LsiydS+2gLxQI 75utgDmPs6C1Sn/Ery8bLeAGiqy0W0eRVOcr0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VZ9tqvejF5zO0V0mIRH8D45Ov2TQfQwaphHJfUiUVeXbPbrJFemzH+8ClRS0LZJwxY Fqq5o03MHHvg+PtToU0flVKfOS3gnUEucfdMOKdomGSazyuIaxVeZuoDA7QPEYttFLiu 4jKtx+aGpEwIJuzUgalceKaot9ZDp1wsrw7nA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.44.10 with SMTP id r10mr8635847war.77.1252906515568; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:35:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:05:15 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aca4a49b4ccd1f81 Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0909132235j10fd89d2v2ee68c279bd79deb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman complains about a ebuild in the tree From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 664071a0-f174-4f08-aa0a-a18a6218f48d X-Archives-Hash: 6a32f5f81b4b714de5390afe15659d67 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Andrey Grozin wrote: > So, the two directories are identical, but repoman behaves differently. > That's because repoman is context-aware. When you use it, it'll look "around" (../..) the current directory for the dependencies. If it finds the deps, it'll check if the ebuilds. If can't find the dependencies, it'll look in ${PORTDIR} for checking them. The former behaviour is for using repoman with cvs portdirs when you need to check specifically *only* that tree. The latter behaviour is for overlays when that tree is *in addition* to the portaget ree. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan GNOME+Mozilla Team, Gentoo