From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MK50q-0004vW-GZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:34:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69318E03DF; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-px0-f178.google.com (mail-px0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E462E03DF for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi8 with SMTP id 8so825387pxi.32 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s9GlXA94pmtAFpX9YtDESqJ1awTPjsLIK0BhwOGTZsQ=; b=Rgz621/oo/tsPAkmQrYYI9u+YVOcD2wSQl/V1JOQuqQtcjkdcmMYMQ9AlH2BqnfWph WRrMbxJGEn3Q8daR6yfWKNu4ghIEWVLk9kkGyLRYRIPi2S60Mo9ETap5oWl8KrUImctL je5lbNM2+3Lfg9+s2nPyhmz/Mi3pbaTNGIC6w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=UBMzng0GVe/Npi9dOIokxRQnlf3raFUbBSyQVRiFlW1CvXV4THXkk8BlZYWkZdNWWv CYpCngjr5bhfK07SNzfUppq33IdRLX1NiOFY94eatZOKVXyrkUcs8BYNVbaubVVs2TW2 GpLPV/g0u8TmGFLvJ0vL8l96ErBF17SYY1Ydc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.115.110.6 with SMTP id n6mr5395437wam.12.1245998054759; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090625205746.287e9bc7@snowcone> References: <200906252100.52295.wk@mailstation.de> <8b4c83ad0906251250k474d15f6vdef8f1afed8d2baf@mail.gmail.com> <20090625205746.287e9bc7@snowcone> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:04:14 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 49a45a72d06c98d5 Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0906252334n512a5f00ra2f5af98c0303ba0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a8c3e44a-28d9-4348-8f6e-803722fb610a X-Archives-Hash: 4c7e35207b47fe52b9aa18ede5a49b10 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:20:09 +0530 > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > Allowing him to proxy in a council meeting is both disallowed > > (non-gentoo devs cannot be on the council) > > Please point to the rule that says that a non-developer cannot be on > the Council, and please point to the rule that says that a Council > member cannot appoint a non-developer as their proxy. I see no mention > of either in GLEP 39, which only restricts voting of Council members to > developers, and only restricts proxies to not having one person with > multiple votes. > Oh so you'll argue semantics now? The spirit of the rule is excessively clear. No non-gentoo-developer can be a member of council -- permanent, temporary, or proxy. If a council member can't find a gentoo developer to be their proxy, that says a lot about the council member. In any case, discussing this with you is completely m00t given my past experiences with discussions with you. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan