From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LqfwA-0008TY-FP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:55:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3631BE051F; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.189]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8D2E051F for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y8so1590639tia.10 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:55:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mmps2uvt1736rBbk9eJMFmxMFI3ejug9nUFXobTmeqI=; b=BCTO2SMUSPTAnubZrDSFzKC8oNvTVZTHiYZVqXBYcQe8n4pWIX5/btfqKA4utK+I1e suTMXpYoDcnMlGRcQZbEoE6+M/TuRy/ta0lJdYN6S/ra7dinCshoPgEY1Ev0bx9McBs0 iBD1W+xXFoVKKhMOpYhq+kGMjWLElgXO0Zcj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=VSfHyWmi/Cj09Hdwqq1N4KWdFc59Zgj/Z7C2J+OHii8xG6Zq91olMfkZ+kSs1r1A6f 2dxe9OCMBc2GRW0gZ9aaVC5BudyukvQgVPYO42LdV66hwifILDIZAjhEYlAOobqojRPw rk+ShSWaGKbiCkgpEDvK6JaHGsLFP72pGbdis= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.110.42.17 with SMTP id p17mr5864000tip.32.1238990151645; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:55:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49D97BDF.8010300@trelane.net> References: <20090218232212.5452b86d@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20090404144727.2e050cb3@snowcone> <200904041812.19289.bangert@gentoo.org> <200904052242.01082.drizzt@gentoo.org> <49D976FD.5060601@trelane.net> <49D97891.3080404@gentoo.org> <49D97BDF.8010300@trelane.net> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:25:51 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b92e2e56159cc2c9 Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0904052055p5e2639des3034934517e5c8e1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info' From: Nirbheek Chauhan To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 6dfd44f2-0ca5-42f7-be62-7f28027b6ddd X-Archives-Hash: 1fc4c4952d0df29832b4c8208e3bc8a5 On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote: > Why is it inappropriate to discuss the poor UI, and implementation of > software we use especially in open source? =A0Maybe if we're closed to > valid argument against poor methodology we can fail like everyone else > who develops closed minded (Debian) and closed source (long list here) > software. =A0Larry the Cow is deeply disappointed in you sir. > Discuss, sure. Flamebait, no. If you flame, the other side gets a license to flame. Let's keep things civil, and restrict ourselves to technical critique. If you want things to prevent war, measure yourself with the same yardstick as you expect others to be. That will be all, Thank you. --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan