From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-35353-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LqfwA-0008TY-FP
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:55:54 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3631BE051F;
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:55:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.189])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8D2E051F
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y8so1590639tia.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Mmps2uvt1736rBbk9eJMFmxMFI3ejug9nUFXobTmeqI=;
b=BCTO2SMUSPTAnubZrDSFzKC8oNvTVZTHiYZVqXBYcQe8n4pWIX5/btfqKA4utK+I1e
suTMXpYoDcnMlGRcQZbEoE6+M/TuRy/ta0lJdYN6S/ra7dinCshoPgEY1Ev0bx9McBs0
iBD1W+xXFoVKKhMOpYhq+kGMjWLElgXO0Zcj4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=VSfHyWmi/Cj09Hdwqq1N4KWdFc59Zgj/Z7C2J+OHii8xG6Zq91olMfkZ+kSs1r1A6f
2dxe9OCMBc2GRW0gZ9aaVC5BudyukvQgVPYO42LdV66hwifILDIZAjhEYlAOobqojRPw
rk+ShSWaGKbiCkgpEDvK6JaHGsLFP72pGbdis=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.110.42.17 with SMTP id p17mr5864000tip.32.1238990151645; Sun,
05 Apr 2009 20:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49D97BDF.8010300@trelane.net>
References: <20090218232212.5452b86d@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net>
<20090404144727.2e050cb3@snowcone>
<200904041812.19289.bangert@gentoo.org>
<200904052242.01082.drizzt@gentoo.org> <49D976FD.5060601@trelane.net>
<49D97891.3080404@gentoo.org> <49D97BDF.8010300@trelane.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:25:51 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: b92e2e56159cc2c9
Message-ID: <8b4c83ad0904052055p5e2639des3034934517e5c8e1@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6dfd44f2-0ca5-42f7-be62-7f28027b6ddd
X-Archives-Hash: 1fc4c4952d0df29832b4c8208e3bc8a5
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> wrote:
> Why is it inappropriate to discuss the poor UI, and implementation of
> software we use especially in open source? =A0Maybe if we're closed to
> valid argument against poor methodology we can fail like everyone else
> who develops closed minded (Debian) and closed source (long list here)
> software. =A0Larry the Cow is deeply disappointed in you sir.
>
Discuss, sure. Flamebait, no. If you flame, the other side gets a
license to flame. Let's keep things civil, and restrict ourselves to
technical critique. If you want things to prevent war, measure
yourself with the same yardstick as you expect others to be.
That will be all,
Thank you.
--=20
~Nirbheek Chauhan